Well thought out but I don't know if Griffey can get there. Too many games and too many health issues that will keep coming his way. What about Pujols, won't he be in there somewhere?
2007-06-04 15:26:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frizzer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that's a pretty good answer. Ken Griifey Jr. will finish pretty high on the all-time list, but his age and inability to stay healthy will most likely lead to his ultimate failure. Alex Rodriguez has an excellent chance if he proves he can play year after year. A decade or so ago when Griffey hit 56 home runs, people were considering his youth and figuring him as a lock for breaking the all-time record. What it really all comes down to is staying healthy.
2007-06-04 15:52:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pookie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Griffey will not challenge the record. He has proven to be way too fragile.
Of the current players, A-Rod has the best opportunity to break whatever the record is when Bonds retires. I think he has a reasonable shot (barring injuries, of course) at hitting 800 homeruns.
Pujols is another possibility, but let's see where he is in 5 years before we even begin speculating about his chances.
2007-06-04 15:27:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by blueyeznj 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You must be high or just really stupid anyway Griffey has no chance of getting even close to 700 Homeruns he'll barely make 630 he's injury proned. No one is going to touch it I see in the future A-rod will also be beset by injuries the only one close is Prince Fielder with the way he's hitting homeruns this year or Ryan Howard.
2007-06-04 18:13:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
its to set a checklist for there QB who helps them in simple terms as much as they help him, additionally they have been precise if the falcons ought to no longer quit the saints it incredibly is there very own fault. those adult males have become paid a lot of money if dropping soccer video games badly impacts them plenty than they're interior the incorrect occupation and incorrect interest era. A team which could thoroughly dominate could this "oh what approximately different communities feeling is stupid" no one interior the main appropriate ideas thinks like that. The exceptions are while a team is so a good distance in the back of in dropping and that they only run out the clock at end of a interest fairly of attempt to attain, or if the triumphing team is triumphing so badly they run out the clock simply by fact there's no longer a ought to win or score on the 2nd. activities guy deliver and committing effects are very distinctive than triumphing and dominating interior the regulations. in case you're you able to could be an even bigger celebrity, leave a legacy, set documents, harm documents. provide the followers what they paid for.
2017-01-10 13:28:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kinda, but first off after bonds breaks it he will go to the a.l. and become a dh so he can add to it... secondly, griffey jr won't break Bonds.... Last, A-Rod will break the Record and be the All-Time Homerun Champion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-06-04 15:21:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by James R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think A-Rod has to leave New York. While he may very well hit 40 homeruns this year, the pressure he is getting from the press makes it seem as if he wouldn't last another three or four years.
2007-06-04 15:29:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Patrick M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
jr just showed up again, if he continues to be good he will, hes still young. Do you think he is also in steroids? I think bonds will stick around another year to make his record harder to break
2007-06-04 15:20:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by latindragon23 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Arod is going to be the home run champwith 817 I think it is my guess about 817 but he is going to be the champ. He was the youngest player to hit 300 and 400 Home Runs
2007-06-08 14:16:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they will dig up Babe Ruth, hit him with some steroids, and he will rise up and put together a couple of 115 home-run seasons to put the record out of reach, and then lay back down.
2007-06-04 15:22:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋