There is new Video evidence circulating through the media right now. It's not well defined and just shows a dark object moving along with a large wake. But still what was it? I think it's the skeptics job to prove it doesn't exist for me not to believe in it. I've seen too much strange evidence to indicate something and I strongly believe it could be a "Plieasaur".
Will S
2007-06-04 15:18:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
There are two answers for that one: the skeptic's answer and the believer's answer.
Here's the skeptic's answer:
Experts have used infrared, thermal imaging, satellite photography, ultraviolet scans, spectrum analysis, motion detectors, sonar, as well as all the technology available to find Nessie, to no avail. Their conclusion: You can't find something that doesn't exist.
Here's the believer's answer:
Technology can't find Nessie since she (or he) is just, by coincidence, hard to detect. Take for example sonar- Nessie might have sensitive hearing and be able to hear the pings of the sonar which causes her to run away from it even while it is still far away, or she just lies down in the lake bed and her features come back to the sonar as part of the bottom, take infrared and thermal, since she lives in the lake, the arguement is that the water acts as a heatsink, thereby cancelling out any heat that might be released, just like the effect you see in the movie fair game, where the lead actor is being spied with a thermal imager when all of a sudden, he drenches himself with cold water, becoming invisible to the imager. Sat photos might just rule out a sighting as floating stuff, to that end, no matter what technology you use, Nessie is just a naturally good evader, it's what made her survive all these years, and of course, with evolution, it's what matters.
2007-06-04 15:22:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eric H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. There is not a large enough food source in the Loch Ness to support a prehistoric creature.
2007-06-04 15:21:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by punch 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is. And there are a lot of them all over..including here in AR in the White River.
Loch Nessis connected to caves ..a lot of them. It is so much area there is no way for anyone to be able to search them out and find it.
I figure why not? Think of all the weird sea creatures that we are still finding out about.
2007-06-04 15:18:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Summertime 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm a huge fan of the loch ness monster my theory is that nessie is a dinasour that managed to survive the climate changes by the meteorite by hiding underwater and that it reproduced himself and that there's more than one. or it could just be anotheranimal from the millions.
2007-06-04 15:23:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by asker? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its totally possible, was reading today there were just 20 new species of animals found just the other day. I certainly believe its possible that it does exsist. We only know like 5% of the water species on earth so there's 95% we have yet to discover.
2007-06-05 07:13:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Samuel 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There have been many attempts to capture this elusive creature on video or film. Many have been proven to be a hoax.
Also, teams of researchers have scoured that lake with sonar equipment, only to come up empty handed.
If she does exist, she is hiding very very well.
2007-06-04 15:14:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by RiverGirl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES IT WAS AT ONE TIME. NEAR THE CASTLE NEAR LOCH NESS IT USED TO BE FED BY THE MONKS IN THE 11-13 CENTURIES. THEN IT DIED. THE LEGEND LIVES BUT THERE IS NO SUCH CREATURE NOW UNLESS IT'S AN EEL OR SOMETHING.
2007-06-04 15:10:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
All the technology we have and they haven't found a "huge" monster living in a lake?
Then it doesn't exist.
2007-06-04 15:09:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by pamiekins 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who knows for sure. Its possible with so many people believing they saw it. Hard to say what is living in that water.
2007-06-04 15:28:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by shellygirl06 3
·
0⤊
0⤋