I know this is a dead subject I still want to know what people think after all these yrs.
2007-06-04 12:15:39 · 15 answers · asked by birddog 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
He will have to stand before God one day and God knows if he did it or not. Lets seem him try to get out of that without his fancy pants lawyers.
2007-06-04 14:41:30 · answer #1 · answered by Ladybugs77 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We all know that oj's azz killed that lady and the other dude I believe that in this case the injustices that black people have face at the hands of white people basically worked for him in this case at the to the dismay of white people everywhere...
2007-06-04 16:08:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I saw the best documentary on this by the Unsolved History team.
There's no doubt he's guilty...you can thank the prosecutors for withholding the best evidence. The jury only did their job - they make a verdict base don what they were told, not what they knew outside of the courtroom.
But we all know the jerk is guilty...
2007-06-04 12:28:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time has a way of showing us things because guilt gets heavier with time.
I am sure he did it and the jury would have found that too, if they would have been able to get all the evidence or testimony if it wasn't for the mess that the prosecutors made in court.
2007-06-05 07:35:43 · answer #4 · answered by ringolarry 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He might have admitted to it on the telephone yet that piece of info might have been thrown out for some reason. apart from, I do have faith you're surprising with regard to the skill for double jeopardy. final he did no longer admit to it so a approaches as i understand yet i think he created a e book named "if i did it" it went into the image info stable how he could have murdered his ex, so how lots else do we would desire to understand earlier its actual a confession? He created the e book, he variety of reported he might desire to uave finished it in the e book. i will pass away that so which you would be able to ascertain because of the fact I purely understand slightly area of the e book
2016-11-04 23:07:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We already know the answer to this question. we knew the answer 13 yrs ago.
2007-06-04 15:46:40 · answer #6 · answered by firefly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IF?! c'mon man! He was gonna write a book about how he did it, if he did *do* it, until common sense took over at Fox for a minute.
"If it doesn't fit, you must aquit" is not a valid defense.
2007-06-04 12:28:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the case has been settled. even though the whole scene was a circus. and a shameful view.
2007-06-04 12:19:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We already know that. The question is will he ever admit it.
2007-06-04 12:21:13 · answer #9 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well he practically admitted it with that stupid book he wrote and nobody would publish
2007-06-06 07:05:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋