2007-06-04 08:38:26 · 13 answers · asked by Big Z 6 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Worse. Duncan is better in the post with more aggressive moves to the hoop, this causes defenses to collapse and gets opposing players in foul trouble. KG can do it too, but relies too much on his turn around jumper to affect the game like Duncan does.
Then there's also leadership, Duncan has led the Spurs to a championship, while KG didn't even say anything while Cassell and Sprewell were imploding what may have been his best supporting cast.
2007-06-04 09:52:55 · answer #1 · answered by kyle d 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As great as KG is, Duncan is a much better fit with the Spurs. KG's playing style is so different from Duncan that the current Spurs would have to change their team's attack and defensive focus.
2007-06-04 09:44:51 · answer #2 · answered by Duq 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Worse in my opinion. I'm a huge Garnett fan, but Duncan, in my opinion, is the most valuable player in the league. Garnett has had players equal to the supporting cast that Duncan has right now in Ginobili and Parker (Sprewell and Cassell), and didn't go any further than Duncan's been able to 3 times already. This says enough in and of itself.
Have you been to RootZoo.com yet? Ask this question there, it's a brand new community just for sports fans, and you'll get some great responses from other basketball nuts and win free prizes just for your participation. Check it out and set up a free screenname there, you'll love it.
2007-06-04 08:42:42 · answer #3 · answered by Syrup 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
they would probaly be worse
tim duncan is alot more dominent then garnett
also garnetts salary is more then duncans with his higher salary the spurs would have less money to give to other players and sign free agents
how many rings does garnett have...? none
duncan has alot more playoff experience and has a couple rings unlike garnett who has never been to the finals
2007-06-04 08:44:53 · answer #4 · answered by Sportscrazy101 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Worse
2007-06-04 08:41:38 · answer #5 · answered by jimstock60 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Worse. Timmy fits in with this team in a way that I don't think Garnett could, even though he's a terrific player.
2007-06-04 08:43:05 · answer #6 · answered by Alice K 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you cant make fun of garnett for not having a ring, you never saw garnett with anyone like robinson, he hasnt had a supporting cast to get there. if garnett was with the spurs he would be so much better. garnett is so much better, he would be unstoppable with san antonio
2007-06-04 08:59:11 · answer #7 · answered by BlahBlahBlah 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They would be worse. Tim Duncan is a stud. Don't diss on him
2007-06-04 08:41:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Worse.
2007-06-04 08:41:13 · answer #9 · answered by spursgolden 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
prob better. garnett is a beast. i know duncan is great, but garnett is the next big man to control the nba. or howard.
2007-06-04 08:44:09 · answer #10 · answered by kwinder00 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋