http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Arkansas_GOP_head_We_need_more_0603.html
Has this guy been studying the PNAC agenda a little too closely?
Doesn't this type of "wishful thinking" qualify someone as mentally unstable?
I'll bet he watches "24" . . . RELIGIOUSLY.
This country is going straight down the tubes if people like this get any more of a foothold in the government.
2007-06-04 07:59:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
What a warped sick-f**k that guy is.
Strayfan is warped too. A republican party leader says something abhorent and he blames Hillary. Sick, sick, sick
2007-06-04 08:08:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What you have failed to accept is that the Bush Administration are the real terrorists.
Here is a link to a 4 min musci video about 911 that rasies a lot of valid questions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVBd03ibziM
If you want to download some other 911 videos & Bush stole the 2000 presidential election with voter fraud in his brothers state of florida you can get to them at :
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
Free more about what is happening to bring about getting the answers to the questions that remain unanswered 5 1/2 years after the staged events.
http://911blogger.com/
There are some great links to 911 truth sites from there.
Thank you for your question.
RON PAUL 4 president
2007-06-04 09:15:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If America is attacked by terrorists, again, won't that expose the fact that Bush has actually done very little to make America safer?
Why would Bush standing in front of another smoking hole in the ground make people appreciate more what he hasn't done for the country?
2007-06-04 08:09:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I just think that it is an idiotic way of stating his position that the only way people are going to be behind Bush is if terrorists prove there is a real threat, and nothing makes it more real than having attacks on your soil. I dont believe he literally means that we need attacks on our soil. Still, what a boob.
2007-06-04 08:38:13 · answer #4 · answered by Bistro 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What he is saying not so articulately is that people do not appreciate that we haven't had any attacks on US soil since Bush has been in. Which he is right. If you listen to the left they take it for granted all the hard work and manpower and money that has gone into making this a safer nation for its citizens. All they whine about is how they are going to get more entitlements out of the government and make us all pay for it.
2007-06-04 08:07:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
er.... again... this would seem to prove that Republicans care little about Americans... or American lives... and only care about their own agenda...
I mean... he says more 9-11 type attacks... that's thousands of lives...
that's insane
2007-06-04 08:14:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We already had another "pearl harbor." it was WTC 9-11
2007-06-04 08:05:40 · answer #7 · answered by pisces02 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
electing hitlery as president would do the trick.
And it's STAY_fan1, not stray_fan1.
And I didn't BLAME hitlery, I analogized to hitlery.
Dear God, learn rhetoric.
2007-06-04 08:05:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
WE NEED RON PAUL NOW!
2007-06-04 08:08:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋