Will the 28 percent of republicans still support Bush for changing his stance on Global Warming?

Question

I mean republicans love the freedom to pollute the enviroment as they want. Does this mean George will lose their support?

Answer 1

No. Anyone who still supports this moron is in it for the long haul. If all the scandals and lies hasn't changed their stance, then global warming won't have any effect. Most likely, these same global warming opponents will follow party lines and change their stance as well.

Answer 2

Your comment is absurd and shows that you are ignorant when it comes to what Republicans and conservatives stand for.

There are not many people, and no one that I know, that purposely wants to or loves to pollute. Most everyone loves the environment. This is not the issue. The issue is that there are differences of opinion on policies, regulations, etc.

There are many on the left that have radical ideas about the environment and think that the mere existence of humans is destroying it.

When it comes to the theory or the practicality of "Global Warming" there is little humans can do to change it. There is also no evidence that global warming is a negative thing.

Global warming is simply being used as a political tool for some people to get praise, others to get votes, some to obtain research funding, and many to try to enact changes in the United States population that would not occur unless there was some made up problem to scare them into making changes.

There simply isn't anything we can do about the natural change in the climate nor is there any reason that we should be concerned with trying to address it specifically. This maddening obsession with global warming is ridiculous at its' face.

Answer 3

There is no such thing as "Global Warming". There always has been climate change....

BERLIN — Just days before hosting a Group of Eight summit that has already drawn violent protests, German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Sunday described President Bush's new initiative on global warming as "very welcome," but insisted it must fall within the framework of United Nations treaty negotiations.

Bush on Thursday proposed the 15 biggest emitters of greenhouse gases hold meetings and set an emissions goal. But he would let each country _ including the U.S., China, India and the major European countries _ decide individually how to implement it.

This is what he's always said.......

Answer 4

He'd lose my support, if he's lost so much of his critical thinking abilities that he's actually starting to BELIEVE that pap....

Instead of pandering to the pinheaded majority, I'd rather he take the time (and wheel out the experts, when necessary) to explain to the American people that global warming is part of the natural cycle of Earth's climate, and nothing to change national policy over...

Answer 5

As a Republican that wants dirty air and water, I am certainly not happy about it. I am even more irritated by his refusal to enforce the border. This guy must be bucking for the Nobel Prize but I am sure he will always be Hitler to his fellow travelers on the left.

Answer 6

He has taken a good stand on environmental issues. He is protecting the Interests of the united states and making china and India (two of the worlds biggest offenders) accountable.
I will always support this president except in regards to amnesty.

Answer 7

Considering that he has only 1 1/2 years left, and it takes time to effect major changes in environmental policy, this only a ploy to raise his approval rating.

Answer 8

you say chnaging but if you would have been viewing www.whitehouse.gov for the last 7 yrs you would had seen what he supported for the environment and issues with GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE.

Answer 9

Approval poles for a second term president are as useless as eight years of a Democrat. "Look I balanced the trade deficit i sent all of the fanny packs to Mexico good thing for NAFTA"

Answer 10

No, the 28% that you are referring to have been deemed brain dead by doctors, with their brains showing no signs of activity.