Why?
2007-06-04 04:29:24 · 14 answers · asked by devesh_kanungo 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Crossbreed species are more lovable.These are having both natures ie acting and luring the public.
These are more attractive than old,rough and khadi kurta chhap leaders.
2007-06-06 07:11:33 · answer #1 · answered by Girish Sharma,yahoo superstar 6 · 17⤊ 0⤋
Like? In what way? They are both entertaining and personable.
Most politicians are actually actors. They say one thing to one group of potential voters, and something completely different to another group.
Who do I think would be a better leader, a politician or an actor? DEPENDS ON THE PERSON.
2007-06-04 11:36:19 · answer #2 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course, an actor, at least he delivers with his facial impression. It is very difficult to read politician's mind, cannot trust his words, expressions are completely dodgy. May be you remember Amitab Bachan lost his chance to become a minister a decade ago, now he is pushing his wife Jaya to achieve which he could not get through "Chamchagri" to Rajev Gandhi. Do you think Jaya will now be successful through Sonia Gandhi, after all they are all chips of the old block with same old family ties. Ultimate goal is the same and that is to become a minister or perhaps Prime Minister. If at all I have to pick out of these two I will go for an actor. Can some one advise Shah Rukh Khan to stand in the next election, I am sure he could be Number One Prime Minister of India. If Govinda, Dharminder, Jya, Basanti can, then why can't Shah Rukh Khan? Come on, go for him!
2007-06-04 13:23:02 · answer #3 · answered by Alf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actor. Hired to perform.
Politician elected to serve, not perform.
I prefer a play I understand is being presented
over game playing by politicians I expect yet
prefer not to see. However, I am forced to decide
what is real there. I do not like that at all.
Go Fred Thompson!!
He is a fine actor, a valued Senator and currently
does not have conflict of interest to impeed his running
for President. Unlike active Senators who serve dual masters. Fall short of both. They should have been forced
to step down in order to protect the interests of their constituents, not political gain. Mrs. Clinton, newly re-elected? State of New York is covered there for sure now.
Thank you.
2007-06-04 11:37:43 · answer #4 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary among others have a far greater acting ability than Fred Thompson ( I like Fred Thompson's acting)
People know Fred is acting when they watch him on television...a lot of people do not realize Hillary is, I guess that makes her a better actor.
I choose to support an Actor with a political back ground..I think he will be good for America.
2007-06-04 11:40:21 · answer #5 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Politicians = Actors acting like “Patriots”.
An actor I guess, at least they don't hide the fact that they're in it from the money.
2007-06-04 11:35:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Is not a politician, an actor in the garb?
2007-06-04 14:39:04 · answer #7 · answered by voleti v 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a politician. the reasons is in him we can see actor also.
2007-06-04 12:11:44 · answer #8 · answered by geyamala 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can see an actor every where as I need to see.
Leaders are id ka chand after geting votes.
2007-06-06 11:31:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fred Thompson is an actor, yet he is more real than any of those plastic, phony Democrat Presidential candidates combined.
2007-06-04 11:32:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Actor is best.
2007-06-05 14:13:03 · answer #11 · answered by BHANU R 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋