2007-06-04 04:13:09 · 10 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If they had ANY presence there at all before Bush's invasion brought them there.
2007-06-04 04:15:58 · update #1
why does a poster below (neo-con) consider Iraq to be the entire middle east?
2007-06-04 04:16:52 · update #2
Why does a neo-con below ask about rapping and dancing?
2007-06-04 04:17:50 · update #3
The invasion wasn't based on uranium. It was based on violations of the cease fire agreement that Sadaam signed after the Gulf War and then refused to live up to. He thought that no one would try to enforce the agreement.
2007-06-04 04:16:34 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
After.
2007-06-04 11:22:53 · answer #2 · answered by ck4829 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think its more out in the open now. not sure how strong it was before the invasion. it could have been underground. but you don't solve violence with more violence. when i was growing up i remember our school teachers and parents telling us violence wasn't the answer that we should talk things out or walk away or the christian saying turn the other cheek.
but we haven't done that we took our fantastic military to a theater of war we knew very little about to fight against ghost and shadow guerrilla tactics. we are getting our butts handed to us. sound familiar ( how bout Britain v. colonies) and we know how that one turned out
2007-06-04 11:21:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Politicians on all sides lie. If they tell the treuth their nose grows longer. Who knows who is telling the truth? I do. None of them.
Al"Q is interested in harrassing the US because they know we will go along way before we do anything. They shy away from countries like Germany or Israel who would welcome the invitation to blow them to Mecca.
Al'Q is getting attention and money from America. Why else would they go to such lengths.
2007-06-04 11:19:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
After without a doubt.
That is Kim, excuse her for she does not know and has nothing intelligent to ever say. I was kind of hoping that she would give up and stop answering on here, but she won't. At least she hasn't asked one of her stupid questions yet.
2007-06-04 11:18:28 · answer #5 · answered by bs b 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Al Qaeda was not present in Iraq before. They just thought it was a nice idea to join in after we went there!
2007-06-04 11:19:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Please ignore Phillip he is using the republican tactic of discrediting somebody's character because he knows the true answer hurts him supporting the war in the first place.
To answer your question: After
2007-06-04 11:17:41 · answer #7 · answered by the_end_of_the_cons 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IT'S BEEN STRONG FOR YEARS...
Al Qaeda maintains a strong presence in the Middle East--duh. They are a Middle-Eastern terrorist organization--duh.
Can you rap and dance? Come on, kick a beat!!!
2007-06-04 11:15:38 · answer #8 · answered by Kim 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Without calling names or pointing fingers (or any other appendages) - After
2007-06-04 11:25:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Did you start asking questions here before or after your sex change operation?
2007-06-04 11:15:23 · answer #10 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋