Reminds one of being in school, say, fourth grade or so.
2007-06-04 03:08:10 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah that is quite stupid. I mean I see the point since they have time restraints that it can give the people watching a quick view of how their favorites feel but for the most part it is stupid. I do like that Hillary spoke up about the one so to show that it was kind of stupid.
2007-06-04 03:12:23 · answer #1 · answered by bs b 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, its the extreme of the "yes or no" answer, as though one can answer some of these complicated issues without explanation. Sadly, I think a lot of Americans prefer the yes/no only questions, and the press will pander to that.
2007-06-04 10:12:24 · answer #2 · answered by skip742 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remind me of a dog show I saw in Israel once.
2007-06-04 10:39:22 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. USA U 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm with you there. Of course their are entirely too many people for a real debate.
2007-06-04 10:11:21 · answer #4 · answered by toff 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Blitzer carried it too far and the candidates actually squaked on stage.
2007-06-04 10:12:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I haven't watched any debate in years.But if that's what they do then that is extremely annoying and childish.
2007-06-04 10:11:20 · answer #6 · answered by Frank Dileo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely the worst thing I saw!
Hillary didn't like it, or "what-if" questions. Good for her!
2007-06-04 10:11:47 · answer #7 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋