Population Control, will mean less demand on our Planet
less use of Natural Resources and less Emissions !
2007-06-04
02:32:17
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Dont be upset, but if true, the only real
way to conserve is to have less population, to Consume, unpleasant but
Logical. You really think , Third World
population will switch to eco safe policies.
2007-06-04
02:42:58 ·
update #1
Truth is sometimes unpleasant, I only
placed the Truth, in front for All to see.
I expect the Less educated to Attack me,
for merely placing a Truth in front of them.
2007-06-04
02:48:06 ·
update #2
I dont believe in Global Warming, I just presented the next Logical step, needed if this Hoax is Allowed to continue.
2007-06-04
02:52:07 ·
update #3
Logically, you are correct. And even morally, I believe you are correct. The planet cannot support the number of people inhabiting her...and we are suffering the effects - with more serious consequences surely to come.
The selfishness of man will be the end of us all - and having large families is truly a selfish act. There is no need for them, and certainly with the burden placed on society as a result - it is an irresponsible and selfish act. Lets care for the ones that already exist first...procreation is purest form of ego man has...
2007-06-04 02:39:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
1⤊
5⤋
I have to laugh at this so called 'global warming'...but that is because as a person who believes in the Bible, it tells us in the book of Revelations, that when you start seeing changes in the sun and the moon, to start getting ready for the judgment day and the end of this system of things...There is nothing that anyone can do, because the Bible has predicted it as such. How arrogant of politicians, to actually think that they can stop the sun from getting closer, or to try to use the phony emissions factor...I have another theory, which goes along with the Bible,...what about all the cell phones in use right now? Could the radiation they emit possibly be burning the ozone layer? If this was a fact, would you stop using your cell phone? Maybe I don't know what i am talking about with that theory...but I do know that you can't change that which has been prophesied...
2007-06-04 02:45:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by MotherKittyKat 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Global warming is not fact, it is conjecture at best. The majority of scientists in the field of study all agree that there is no way to know long term cycles at this point, so we are warming in a short term cycle but we are also cooling in a long term cycle, you cannot have one without the other.
I have been told by people that their intent is to take control of the government through numbers, that they would just have more children than the other side of the debate.
AMericans have reduced their birth rate that very soon they are going to be extinct.
Our planet will outlive all of us, regardless of what we do. The planet can heal itself, people cannot.
We have more resources than we will ever need, and our "emissions" are so minuscule in the bigger picture of the globe that they are not measurable.
So NO, I have to disagree, there is no problem to solve here.
2007-06-04 03:30:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
There's no reason, because we are not the cause... Try doing some research and you'll find.
1. CO2 levels rise after increased temperature, not the opposite.
2. The earth was warmer during the 1300's, called the Medieval Warming Period.
3. Climate Change does exist and follows the same patterns as solar activity.
2007-06-04 02:58:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cookies Anyone? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
One word...yes! Of course, saying that will raise the hackles of people who will ask, "Well, who should we control?" I think the answer is more than obvious. In my opinion, if America were to revert back to a time when life, itself, was respected, if basic freedoms weren't abused and a sense of purpose was instilled in our children, we wouldn't have the problem of deciding who should have babies.
There's been such a decline in morality over the past two decades (I say two decades because I was born in 1970, so I don't remember much). The world has accepted the twisted way things are now....race mixing, laziness, inferior education, abortion and birth out-of-wedlock (before you get upset, I'm just as guilty of that. My husband and I remedied that error and now we instill marriage-then-children beliefs in our kids) and the many other slippery-slope concepts that pervert the generations. My question is...what does it take to make this stop? If it means controlling the population, so be it. But it should also mean re-instilling values to our future generations.
2007-06-04 02:42:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
merely attempting to choose opinion so short solutions are nice. To what quantity do you settle with right here... a million) Anthropogenic (human) worldwide Warming (AGW) is actual. on the grounds that we've given off CO2 that's actual yet probable insignificant. 2) AGW is a fantasy created as an excuse to strengthen taxes. that's a actual phenomena a great deal exaggerated with the help of a few this is used as an excuse to push a politcal schedule that would desire to contain taxes yet probaly is extra centred on changing our society from a customer pushed one. often that is purely pushed with the help of nicely meaning people who think of they are doing something sensible. 3) Scientists do no longer comprehend the mechanisms which reason climate substitute. They comprehend the mechanism yet usually overestimate their wisdom and ability to foretell. 4) The planet may well be warming yet that's no longer unusual and there have been sessions of comparable warming interior the previous. authentic 5) maximum scientists can no longer even agree if climate substitute is occuring maximum scientists are afraid to disagree because of the fact that is been examined what happens to those that do. that is as low as being accused of being interior the decrease back wallet of the oil and gas industry to being accused of being like the holocast deniers. So who is conscious what maximum scientists think of. maximum scientists don't have a clue IMO. 6) If there grew to become right into a upward push interior the quantity of greenhouse gases from organic aspects (oceans, soil, livestock, decomposition and so on) this might convey approximately, or make contributions to, worldwide warming. Contributions might desire to be negligible, average, or important 7) If worldwide warming grew to become into going on, there is not any longer something we are able to do to end it. it may well be perplexing. changing mild bulbs to flourescents and getting extra useful vehicles won't rely a level in a century IMO yet nonetheless is a life like undertaking with the help of itself advantage 8) climate substitute is the main important risk at present dealing with humanity. no longer even close IMO 9) Proponents of climate substitute could learn the data. actual 10) Skeptics of climate substitute could learn the data. actual
2016-12-30 17:10:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO. Because man is not causing "Global Warming."
There certainly is no concensus in the scientific community, that man is causing the earth to warm.
Unfortunately, evil, ignorant and just plain stupid people have been disseminating propaganda, about the warmer earth, whilst ignoring the facts about cyclic warming and cooling and the effects more sunlight are having upon the earth; they find it convenient to blame man, for heating the earth.
2007-06-04 02:52:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by mrearly2 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Just because a group of non-believers in the word of GOD, removed HIS word from the public and HIS laws (The Ten Commandments) from our court system does not cancel GODS WARNINGS...
For it is written in Revelation 16:7-9
7 And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous are thy judgments.
8 And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire.
9 And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory.
---------------------
It is the unrepented sins of mankind that is bringing on the promise of Global Warming.
2007-06-04 03:02:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cheryl 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
How clever, hit two birds with one stone. Insult the liberals for believing in global warming and the choice of a woman to do what she chooses with her body at the same time.
Now if only you could use this intellectual capacity to actually come up with SOLUTIONS...
2007-06-04 02:51:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Huey Freeman 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
You could be the first on line to get fixed in the name of population and climate control. You could be the first in line to not use a car, stop buying from large companies, plant your own garden, and if requested, give your life first to cut back on the population. You're breathing my air. You let out too much carbon dioxide already.
2007-06-04 02:42:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by su·i ge·ne·ris 4
·
4⤊
1⤋