Are illegals even necessary?

Question

I argue absolutely not.

Machinery easily replaces low-skill labour- seen many times in Japan with rice & tea harvesting. Japan has negligible immigration for low-skill employees- the world's no. 2 economy.

Machinery not only works out to be more efficient and cost-effective in the long-term- the obstacle is the initial capital investment which many employers choose not to make as cheap, disposable labour is more easily attainable at hand.

If employers were to invest in machinery- it would create long-term, sustainable employment and build the manufacturing sector- not to mention the financial sector.

Native populations are not lazy- it is a myth. Simple truth is natives won't work for a crap wage and no rights.
Immigrants are attractive as they are cheap, expendable & are hidden from laws and taxation.

Higher wages= people spending= more robust & sustainable consumer sector= more demand= more manufacturing= more revenue for government= more jobs for all.

Immigrants= unnecessary

You're a fool. I live in England- Iam neither Republican nor Democrat. And yes- employers should be prosecuted.
It's a pity your country has only two parties.

Answer 1

Most Americans (or rather, their ancestors) were illegal aliens at one time or another (1/2 of mine were not). Immigration, from all societies, was and is the backbone of America.

Now then, illegal invasion is another question. We are not the America that once was. The America that was, for just one example, was well represented in the Battle of New Orleans, 1815. Freedom from Mexico, the Battle at the Alamo in San Antonio, Texas in 1836.

We need new "battles" for our independence and they should not be engaged in on Iraqi soil.

Immigrants are necessary, illegal immigrants (invaders) are not.

Answer 2

No direct proof. However, considering unlawful immigrants do take cash out of the economic climate in a number of methods that don't seem to be again, it could look most probably the economic climate could a minimum of keep the identical if no longer upgrade. While the exact numbers of non-taxpaying unlawful immigrants isn't specific there's a giant quantity of them utilising offerings corresponding to remedy and schooling. Those offerings must be paid for via greater expenses and taxation. Were the ones expenses lowered small employers maybe bigger competent to broaden their trade pursuits thereby using extra at bigger wages. I suppose that if wages might be elevated for hard work that extra folks could be inclined to do the paintings thereby growing employment and lowering tax burdens at the hired. In addition to that's the consistent drain of bucks despatched to foriegn international locations by way of unlawful immigrants. We can most effective wager at the ones numbers however this is a colossal drain at the economic climate. The subsequent is the rate of authorized movements adding border patrol, courts and deportation movements. These are all matters that have got to be integrated within the quandary. Reasonably, you will have to additionally incorporate all different expenditures corresponding to elevated crime price. To date, to the satisfactory of my advantage, no person has performed a complete and impartial comparison of the monetary influence of unlawful immigration however it sort of feels that it is vitally top.

Answer 3

You have a vivid sense of imagination.

Are you ever going to ask about something other than illegals!

Your whole diatribe would make sense but you blew the entire premise in paragraph 4.

Instead of going after illegals all the time, try something innovative, like going after their criminal employers!

As long as I have been on here I have never EVER heard a Republican say go after the employers WHO ARE CRIMINALS....and , for the most part REPUBLICAN!

Answer 4

The Democrats see them as a new potential voting block.