English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It kind of beats me, because other newspapers and numerous web sites often assign such ratings, either in star or number form. (The objective of the question also applies to another New York journal, the Village Voice.)

2007-06-03 23:05:43 · 5 answers · asked by pierre612004 2 in News & Events Media & Journalism

5 answers

that would be saying some good things were good

2007-06-04 01:33:26 · answer #1 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 0 0

The New York Times would have reported it if they had any real reporters. The once great newspaper has become a rag. Useful for packing and birdcages. Obama seems to pass the buck and this is a norm for him. He still blames Bush for everything and anything and that in itself is getting redundant .He is dumb as a fox. Can't ban handguns but can tax the heck out of ammo.A change has come my friends.

2016-05-20 23:38:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Many newspaper and websites attach star ratings to reviews, and a good many do not. It's just an editorial decision.

2007-06-07 19:48:21 · answer #3 · answered by Willard Whyte 2 · 0 0

Want to remain objective and not giving opinions in the news section of the newspaper. they do not carry betting lines either.

2007-06-04 01:58:24 · answer #4 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0 0

cause they r boring and old people who dont like movies

2007-06-10 14:44:11 · answer #5 · answered by Jess 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers