English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

The country of Iraq didn't attack the U.S., supposedly it was individuals acting on their own. So it makes no sense attacking a whole country for what a few individuals allegedly did.

2007-06-03 23:09:20 · answer #1 · answered by Dke 6 · 1 2

2 planes one each was sufficient enough to destroy them completely, one hit better than the other causing more destruction because it was hit at the right calculated height.

Height of Pentagon is less, so It was not hit properly, the plain fell short to Pentagon still caused some destruction.

Iraq war is out of insecurity feeling of USA President. Attack is the best form of defence. Iraq/Iran and belt around it has been involved in anti USA acts (That is what is belived by USA atleast). USA did not want to take any chances therefore attacked Iraq. USA had not anticipated the ill effects of the same, which are visible now.

2007-06-03 23:19:41 · answer #2 · answered by james 2 · 1 0

Yes 2 planes hit the World Trade Center. Yes a plane hit the Pentagon.

We had intellagence that Saddam had wepons of mass distruction. Those reports truned out to be wrong.

I wouldn't have trusted Saddam after what he did to the Iranians and the Curds.

2007-06-03 23:10:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

1. Yes two planes
2. Evidently yes
3. Another plane
4. Why Iraq is the only intelligent question - and the answer is it had nothing to do with 9/11 - Dubya just siezed the opportunity to do something he had planned to do all along.

2007-06-03 23:12:30 · answer #4 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 2 2

Ok, wow, obviously you have been in a cave somewhere with your eyes shut and earmuffs on to not know these details by now. There is a gigantic plethora of video, photographs, interviews, and documents ALL OVER THE NET. Chuck a rock over your shoulder and you'll hit more info on this than you know what to do with.

2007-06-03 23:09:17 · answer #5 · answered by Dull Jon 6 · 2 2

Thou shalt not beat a dead horse.
this topic has been argued over for 5 years. The conspiracy theorists have no case that can stand up to science.
lets give it a rest ....mkay?

2007-06-03 23:08:19 · answer #6 · answered by rsist34 5 · 3 1

a tin hat will cure you

2007-06-03 23:32:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers