2007-06-03
21:44:43
·
14 answers
·
asked by
ibid
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
If you take into account the various policy intiatives that each nominee has pledged you can very well see Bushies neconservatives will regain and continue with their defunct foreign policy. What most conservatives don't understand on an intellectual level is that coercive intervention is likely to open floodgates of problem, not stem the tide of terrorism or solve the problem through remedial violence.
On issues such as religion, it is also more likely that they will be more conservative than Bush in education, funding, abortion, etc. With the exception of Guiliani, this indicative move can and will jepordize the Constitution's underpinnings in ensuring that no "established religion" should be excericised.
With welfare, its looking even more bleak. Not one will pledge to revamp social security (although its likely to collapse by 2025) neither will they continue with supplemental measures to decrease medical insurance costs. They are also not interested in expanding the public s
2007-06-03
21:50:56 ·
update #1
On Iraq, all of these nominees are vowing to continue this disastrous war with the intended consequence of ending a 1,400 year old feud between Shi'ites and Sunnis. How the US going to do that in just a few meager years? Religion has never stopped the outpour of violence just look at Palestine and Israel.
2007-06-03
21:57:08 ·
update #2
For who, Pelosi and friends?
2007-06-03 21:49:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
What you don't understand is that 9/11 was the direct result of failed foreign policy. Not republican policies Democrat policies than did not face the problem and allowed it to grow stronger. The threat s we face today in the world stem from the weak responses and back alley political drama of the democrats.
2007-06-03 22:28:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The greenback is sinking because of the fact Bush had a lot of of them revealed that the fee went down....that befell to a distinctive united states in the previous: Germany revealed Reichsmark like loopy to pay for his or her wars---and in 1948 they had to do a sparkling forex---and gave human beings in basic terms 10% of what that they had saved---it relatively is going to ensue over right here too, one way or the different. i've got already heard something approximately open borders from Mexico to Canada and bobbing up a sparkling forex called the Amerodollar.... even nonetheless each and everything looks to artwork in desire of the dems dazzling now, the oil disaster ought to truly artwork in desire of the republicans---because of the fact the situation is so undesirable that multiple human beings probably might help a conflict against Iran, in order that as that they might get oil extra good fee---besides the shown fact that, if it includes that, then all of us are in for disaster---because of the fact Iran is supported via Russia, China is its greatest customer. So I do wish that folk understand that rather of going to conflict for oil, we ought to constantly use our very own factors at homestead and locate selection factors for capability....they're available, it relatively is only that they by no ability relatively have been given promoted......
2016-11-25 21:00:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by feldmann 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
im sorry i took so long to answer, but i was laughing so hard when i read your question that i couldnt tell if you were being seroius or not. thank god a conservative with success in nyc as rudy guliani has is running or wed be alot better off with a nancy pelosi clone or god forbid another eight years of hillary.
consider the actions of the last liberal extremist president we had.
Bill Clinton..
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
how would the continuation of these poicies bring sucess and a positive future to the united states? the reality check is liberalism or socialst extremist policy as the clintons or the pelosi/reid regime are trying to install in this country simply wont work.
i, apparently unlike you, have no desire to return to the antics of a liberal presidency like the clintons as I understand the damage that type of extremism can cause
travelgate, filegate, whitewater, the cattle futures fiasco, the health care fiasco, the vince foster coverup, jennifer, monica, paula, the largest tax increase in us history, the tie breaking vote to tax social security breaking a fifty year promise to this nations elderly, the four time veto of welfare reform then stealing credit for it from the contract with america, i did not have sex with that woman..etc, etc, etc,....bottom line hear. you deal in theory on your side of the aisle, i deal in FACT from what a liberal has already done in office recently. sorry liberal, you lose on this one..have a nice day...lmfao.
2007-06-03 23:50:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. For the Lefties who thought that the last election meant people preferred their views. Let's face it, the last election was about people being against Bush and the war.
We lost some very good people in the senate because they stood up for what they believed in. They were replaced with people who are definitely not up to the job. And it put Pelosi in a position to think that she runs the country.
With Bush out of office the left has nothing left to lead them to victory. They certainly can't win on their views or beliefs.
2007-06-03 21:54:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by ProudAmerican 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
We can only hope for a conservative victory. It would be disastrous if we have another Clinton-Carter type presidency!
2007-06-03 22:33:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It seems that you are concerned with war, abortion and welfare.
War is here to stay, until the terrorists are all dead. Abortion is in it's final days now. The Supreme Court is poised to strike down this barbaric practise. Welfare/social security needs to be abolished anyhow. If we run out of money for this crap, good! It's time we abolished it anyhow.
2007-06-03 21:55:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
If the heartland agains holds the nation hostage with its medieval values, I can only hope that the blue states will secede.
2007-06-03 21:53:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It will signal nothing more than another stolen election.
Read Greg Palast's Armed Madhouse.
2007-06-03 22:08:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Norton N 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
it would show that America is not OK with San fransico value's and this is a smart thing.
2007-06-03 21:52:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋