English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070603/D8PHDMEO0.html

2007-06-03 21:13:52 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Agreed - shouldn't he support the president and stop bashing this country?

2007-06-03 21:41:28 · answer #1 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 0 1

Newt is a Republican who was stripped from his post, censured and decided to leave. He is not liberal, though I don't know about commie!

Ironic he would say this, a person who abused his post and was cheating on his wife.

Gingrich added, "The key question is: Is somebody prepared to stand up and say that the American people deserve fundamental change in Washington?"

God, I hope fundamental change is that we throw all the people like Newt OUT of office!

And we do deserve fundamental change! Wave goodbye Republicans! We don't need more thieves who give to the rich and take from the poor!

2007-06-03 21:44:42 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

Correction Newt is not a liberal he far right conservative who still believes the world to be flat.

A true hypocrite who was having an affair as he led the impeachment of Clinton. A true man or moral and family values.

2007-06-04 00:56:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Newt is NOT a liberal. He is a card-carrying GOP member. The liberals wouldn't have him.

Freedom of speech is why Newt Getrich is allowed to spew his hatred.
,

2007-06-03 23:13:18 · answer #4 · answered by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4 · 1 0

I don't like Newt Gingrich, either, but what did he say in that particular article that is "liberal" or "commie"?

2007-06-03 21:17:49 · answer #5 · answered by TheOrange Evil 7 · 0 0

final time I checked , we've been at conflict with the Taliban. Why would desire to we enable one among their cousins inti the White homestead? This one befell 150 years in the past yet i think of its nevertheless appropriate because of the fact Mitt Romneys church pardoned a terrorist mass murderer of human beings and guarded over a hundred different accomplices from federal prosecution. It replaced into 9-11, 1857. A wagon practice of one hundred sixty settlers on their thank you to California replaced into massacred by utilising a team of Mormons wearing Indian clothing. 17 infants under the age of 8 have been spared and lived to tell their tale. 1st. They dressed as Indians yet after 5 days they replaced tactics. 2nd. Then they went somewhat away ,dressed returned into established clothing and acted like the Rescue social gathering who had negotiated a cope with the"Indians". third, Then confiscated each and all the weapons as component to the deal for "saving" the travelers and Mormon dissidents( who have been the reason of the attack interior the 1st place). 4th. Took anybody off a mile or so and shot all of them. 2 adult men have been given away yet have been at last tracked down and killed an afternoon or so later. 5th. Took the 17 infants that they had no longer killed returned with them to Salt Lake city. 6th. have been given away with it. After a publicized trial, with the young infants very own testimony admitted into the courtroom, basically a million guy replaced into convicted and shot, John D. Lee. ( pardoned by utilising Church 1960) It ended up being called the Mountain Meadows bloodbath. the 1st time in U.S. historic previous that U.S. electorate have been massacred on U.S. soil by utilising religious wackos. This adventure is much greater significant because of the fact the full U.S. inhabitants on the time replaced into plenty smaller.(I dont recognize the real numbers, perhaps basically 30 million or so) In todays numbers it may be around 1400 ineffective

2016-10-09 10:22:50 · answer #6 · answered by hemmingway 4 · 0 0

Because we are not yet a dictatorship.

The only commies I can think of live in N Korea and China. You must be a VERY old guy.

2007-06-03 21:21:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

When did Newt Gingrich become a Lib !!!?

2007-06-03 21:29:56 · answer #8 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 1 0

Well first thing, he is Republican.

Secondly, all I read is that he sees problems in America and wants to see change for the better. Is that hate?

Honestly, i wonder if people are loyal to Republican beliefs or to George Bush only.

2007-06-03 21:16:53 · answer #9 · answered by leikevy 5 · 2 0

Newt Gingrich is not only Republican but he is a neoconservative but oh I don't suspect you know what that is

2007-06-03 21:26:02 · answer #10 · answered by ibid 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers