English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

.

That's a very good question -- because most people in
or society really needs to try to begin to understand that
the 'African-American' (AA) 'Ethnic' group is *not* the
same group as the ’Black American' (BA) 'Race' group --
that the two (2) terms are *not* synonymous and that the
two (2) terms should *not* be used inter-changeably.

We are *not* speaking of ‘semantics’ here – but rather
– the BAs & AAs are two different groups of people.

The AAs are the (largely Mixed-Race) ETHNIC group.

The BAs are the (Mono-Raced) RACE group.

As confusing as it seems -- the U.S. government
[due to racism & wanting to stigmatize the part
of their lineage that was from Africa which, by
the way, is only one part of their lineage] ---

has labeled those individuals who are the known
"descendents of the survivors" of the system of
chattel-slavery found in the USA as being AAs
(the hyphen is used in reference to acknowledging
the fact that most of them are Mixed-Race,
with African & non-African blood lines)

AND

has labeled those people who are "volitional immigrants"
who are directly from places such as the continent of
African, the West Indies, etc. -- as being BAs
(with the word 'Black' used in reference to acknowledging
the fact that they are of a Mono-racial full-Black lineage).

In addition, it should also be remembered that – although
some AAs adhere to a socio-political ‘identity’ that is
often described by the slang term of “black”—the AAs
are actually *not* a "Race" group at all -- but rather
they *are* a largely Mixed-Race 'Ethnic' group
(and the socio-political ‘identity’ that a person chooses
*does not* change their racially-mixed ancestral lineage).

Most (+70%) of the people born to two (2) parents who
are of the AA ‘Ethnic’ group are are of a Multi-Racially
‘Mixed’ (MGM) lineage – while the people to two (2)
parents who are of the BA ‘Racial’ group – on the
other hand – are of a Mono-Racially ‘Black’ lineage.

There is a big difference between a largely Multi-racial
'Ethnic' group and between a Mono-racial 'Race group.

In addition, there is also a big difference between
one's socio-political 'identity' (ex. "black") and
one's ancestral racial 'lineage' (ex. 'Mixed').

Just because a person adheres to a given
socio-political 'identity' does *not* change
the composition of their ancestral 'lineage'.

Also -- the 'One-Drop' Rule (the false teaching that
'any amount' of Black ancestral lineage make a
person "full black") is nothing more than pure-racism.

The racist 'One-Drop Rule' (used only by the United
States government, by the way) was created during
the antebellum, chattel-slavery era by White racial
supremacist in order to get people to believe the false
racist myth that the so-called White "race" was "pure"
and to falsely view the Black "racial" admixture
(even the slightest amount) within someone's
ancestral lineage as being "tainted".

To embrace the 'One-Drop Rule' is the equivalent of BOTH
embracing "racism" and embracing the false teaching
that a Mixed-Race person's Black lineage is "tainted".

My advice is that a non-Racist should *not* embrace
the concept of the 'One-Drop Rule' -- as "Black blood"
is *not* "tainted" -- and should never be perceived
or embraced as being so (not even in the
name of so-called "pride" and "unity").

In addition, legally-speaking, attempted forcible
application of the racist 'One-Drop Rule' -- against
any individual or group -- was made illegal and ruled
as unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court
in 1967 via the case of 'Loving vs. The State of Virginia'.

Through the 'Loving vs. Virginia' case, the U.S.
Supreme Court, ruled against both all of the laws
banning Interracial marriage -- and -- also ruled
that any so-called law which forcibly applied the
'One Drop Rule' -- was racist, discriminatory,
illegal, unconstitutional, and non-enforcible.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1402

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400

Related Links:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MGM-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FGM-Mixed

------------------------PLEASE NOTE---------------------

--- Dr. Luigi Caveli-Sforza, who is the Executive
Director of the Human Genome Project and the
world's foremost authority on human genetics
has both tested and proven that more that 70%
of all AAs have a full ancestral lineage which
consists of +20-30% White / European and
more than +25% Amerindian bloodlines.

--- That means that the 'average' (+70%) person
born to two (2) parents who are both members
of the AA Ethnic group actually has slightly
less than 50% Black / African blood lineage
found in his or her full-ancestral lineage.

For more information -- see supporting links listed below:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1399
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1032
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1034
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/991
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1570
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1573

--------------------------- ADDED NOTE ---------------------

It should also be noted that -- contrary to popular belief and
myth spread among many groups who are not educated or
informed on the whole topic -- it was not the group that is
currently being referred to as being the African-Americans
(AAs) -- who chose this term for them -- but rather --
like so many of the other terms used to describe
them -- this term was also implemented by
the United States federal government
(starting with the 1990 United
States 'Census Bureau' Forms).

If a person insists on spreading the 'myth' that it was the
AAs who chose this term for themselves -- it is clearly
indicative of the fact that they have never even once
actually studied the entire topic and are simply basing
their comments on assumption-based ignorance --
rather than objective facts and empirical evidence.

.

2007-06-06 15:46:24 · answer #1 · answered by mixedraceperson 6 · 1 0

Currently The U.S. census classifies anyone with ancestry predominate in sub-saharan Africa as African American or Black regardless of when they came to America. The two can be used interchangably.

Fairly recently some have been trying to redefine "African American" as a distinct ethnic group for people who have a history of slavery. But it isnt as mainstream as the census classification. So st this point the U.S. census classification stands.

2007-06-03 17:48:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Black refers to the race of people that have dark skin and ******* blood. African american is a term that refers to black americans.

2007-06-03 15:16:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I agree with the first answer. And quite frankly I don't see how someone can be called an African American if they weren't even born there let alone ever stepped foot on the continent.

2007-06-03 15:12:52 · answer #4 · answered by Yvonne Cesaro 6 · 1 1

neither are literal as a rule or I would expect american blacks to refrain from the african american as they probably know nothing of or have ever been to africa and what if a white man migrates from his native South Africa to the the US does he call himself an African American?

2007-06-03 15:14:16 · answer #5 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 1 0

My troll answer: One is a colour the different is a team of folk! My serious answer: i think of the term African American is basically for people who straight away got here from Africa. Heck everyone may be African American, Black, White, Hispanic, etc. Charlize Theron is greater African American than you're because of the fact she onced LIVED there. You pal has a element, although that's stupid for her to declare she would not have any African roots if she is Black. Black human beings from united statesa. would desire to easily be called human beings, everyone born contained in united statesa. would desire to be called human beings. All this African, Black, Asian, Hispanic American labeling is dividing us as a rustic.

2016-10-09 09:59:43 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

black is for all ppl of african descent. jamaicans, hatians, africans etc

african americans are ppl whose african ancestors were slaves in america, and they live in america

2007-06-03 15:39:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I personally don't agree with either one since I am brown skinned, and my ancestry is from the Congo. Just call me Bantuwm :)

2007-06-03 16:13:36 · answer #8 · answered by VA LayD 2 · 0 0

african american is a TERM society came up with ; as they all are!! we are all HUMANS period!!


you don't certain caucasin americans called EUROPEAN AMERICANS, now do you??
just another way to separate people!

2007-06-03 15:11:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Depends on who you ask.

2007-06-03 15:11:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers