Anyone who thinks Ohio State could have won that night and is a better team is a fool. Ted Ginn would not have made much a difference. It was clear Floridas team speed and defensive packages were too much for the Buckeyes offense. That's why Tressel made the calls he did. Troy Smith couldn't handle the pressure Florida was giving him all game. It wasn't even a game it was over in the first half. No I'm not a Gator. OSU get over it the Big 10 was overrated last year OSU got spanked so did Michigan.
2007-06-03 15:20:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by 24YanksMilan 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
first ohio state was the most overrated team of all time.....they got destroyed by a team that would have ran away with the big ten .......michigan choked(normal) as we saw usc easily beat them.......and if u did watch ohio state all year since i live in columbus you would have seen that they werent that great they had a couple close games illinois lost in a nail biter to them florida had a much better defense than ohio state if u can't give your quaterback time to throw the ball then there is no reason one player (teddy ginn) would have made a difference.......the flaw was osu offensive line...... offensive line as a whole team florida was better U DONT WIN THE SEC AND EXCPECT TO LOSE
2007-06-05 01:56:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by case 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
well i think it would have been a better game if they played it in the same lifetime as the rest of the season. that's all i'm saying
and if ted ginn was their, flordia would have less points.
ohio state offense+ted ginn= more time of possien
more time of possien= less points for florida
just saying
2007-06-03 22:05:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by random bailey 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Who was a better team last year, UCLA or USC. Of course USC, even if UCLA won head to head. The reason OSU lost that game had nothing to do with Ted Ginn and everything to do with ESPN and everyone else giving them the game before it started. Anyone that watched OSU all year would tell you they played flat. FLA won the game and the national championship, and I was one of the few outside the state that thought they would. (I made a lot of money on it) but I think if that game was played in the first few weeks of the season, FLA loses 6 out of 10.
And all that blabering about SEC speed, don't forget the big ten was 2 and 1 against them in bowl games, with the lower ranked big ten team beating higher ranked SEC team.
2007-06-03 23:35:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by blibityblabity 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
I watched that game and it looked like Florida proved that Ohio State Sucks.
2007-06-03 22:25:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by stan l 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
well, if ginn hadnt gotten injured, the break the buckeyes got wasnt so long and tressel stopped using that dumb @$$ zone he used, maybe they would have won. i think overall osu had the better team, they just werent prepared at all and were deflated when one of their top play makers had to go out
2007-06-03 22:06:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by panther2188us 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
first of all ohio state is better florida they were just having an off day not everyone is perfect i agree that flordas rb is alot better than ohoi states and there recievers are about equal but troy smith is alot better than tim teabow and chris leak (not combined) i know there is alot of people that dont like troy smith but he is one hell of a football player ohio states defence is alot better than floridas
2007-06-03 22:20:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Adam H 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Everybody? Are you sure? Flawed sentence completely illogical
2007-06-03 22:03:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Papadapa 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
no if he was still in some of there other wrs like robiskie would've been covered by linebackers like siler who he would beat everytime the they would take the 2team off gin and head score tds
2007-06-04 01:30:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by frank the tank 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
florida beats ohio st any day
2007-06-03 22:21:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋