2007-06-03 14:22:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No, it sucks if it's the bride and the groom, especially if they have control freak parents and the bride and/or groom is inexperienced. ("Jimmy, I believe you're doing that wrong..."). It's not fun for parents with young children, since they have to explain the whole thing. ("Mommy, if he's not hurting her, why is she making all those sounds...). And if the bride and groom are old people, then it's no fun for anyone involved. If you like that sort of thing, just have the groom tape it and send it to you after the honeymoon.
2007-06-03 14:29:42 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. Psychosis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good one for an imaginative mind!!
The reception would be a better place than the altar :-)
2007-06-04 00:35:05 · answer #2 · answered by Encryptor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Indeed, they would. But most couples have already screwed hundreds of times before getting married. So it would be a meaningless gesture. Sort of like getting married.
2007-06-03 21:25:47 · answer #3 · answered by Nicole B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why just the bride and groom... there is a reason the guy is called "best man" make him prove it
2007-06-04 06:07:33 · answer #4 · answered by shazam 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe at the reception, after everyone's had a few--but not on the altar lol
2007-06-03 21:25:01 · answer #5 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
eww... sick...
wouldn't many of the guests have to be revived, if so?
It would probably spoil the reception, too. lol
2007-06-03 21:25:12 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that might spoil the reception
but i can see your point
and if it was done properly it might work
2007-06-03 21:43:53 · answer #7 · answered by Clemsonbabe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oi, voyeur much?
2007-06-03 21:25:02 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ Etheria ♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋