Have you heard?

Question

Bush has promised more money than ever before to help AIDS victums in Africa?

Of course you haven't. The liberal media won't report it. But if it had been a Dem Pres it would have been front page news.

Answer 1

Yes I heard it.
WHY don't the people in Africa EVER help themselves? I would really like to know that answer.

Answer 2

Funny, I heard about this on Michael Savage, Bush had
previously stated that he was going to give Africa
$15 billion and has now increased it to $30 billion.

Interesting that you call the media liberal and then go one
and say that if it had been a Dem President it would have
been all over the front pages, the Democrats are the liberals.

I am more shocked that the liberal media has not plastered
this all over the front pages, perhaps they will when the
bill passes through the House and Senate.

Where did you hear about this? I have not seen it on any
of the news networks at all.

Answer 3

Africa's Government is ruled by highly corrupted drug lords and the people there are very tribal.
So if whatever money is sent there by us for whatever reason will only fund drug lords terrorism among the people and cause even more problems for them.
The tribes are highly racist towards one another and will fight over money and food and a civil war will break out.
Africa is highly unstable politically and cannot conduct itself in a civilized manor.
So if President Bush is sending money to Africa I highly doubt it will benefit anyone who isn't Government.
So what's the real reason behind him giving them money?
Because it certainly isn't for Aids.

Answer 4

Newt taught the Repubs that could do anything they wanted as long as they said the "correct" things to the media. This is just another fine example. You are right about the media. If they gave Bush's War 10% of the coverage they gave Clinton's BJ, we would not still be letting our troops die in Iraq.

Google "total information awareness".

Answer 5

News flash:

The Media is controlled by the right.

But you wouldn't know that because they won't report it. Anyone with a brain can clearly see it, however. It takes very little effort to research it, too. TV, Radio, newspapers - overwhelming majority controlled by the right.

Answer 6

THAT IS GOING TO MAKE UP FOR WOLFOWITZ
who at the head of the world bank did largely reduce programms to prevent aids in Africa... in turn the infection rates which were on the way of getting curbed reincreased.

So basically its ok if they get aids (and pay for their sin) and the US gives them later tri-therapy ???

Answer 7

Yes I've heard, but then I don't rely on the main stream media for accurate information.

Answer 8

Have you heard how many soldiers died this weekend or do you only research aids? The press tells it all. It doesn't all come up on the front page.

Answer 9

I heard and I disagree with him doing it. 30 billion over the next 5 years, I hope they kill it.

Answer 10

1 - promised? come on now, is this like the checks in the mail.

2. a ref. for this?