English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

core duo definitely is more powerful and better performance

2007-06-03 11:18:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you do not have a 2 GHZ processor. middle 2 Duo is purely 2 cores on one die- not 2 a million.seventy 3 Ghz processors. you're purely working a million.seventy 3 Ghz AMD processors are distinctive. the type huge form is the Intel equivalent- i.e., Athlon 4000+ is two.6 Ghz, however the equivalent of a 4 Ghz Intel. Intel Ghz are a similar- a million.seventy 3 Ghz is a million.seventy 3 Ghz -On real of that your VHS to DVD utility is probable not designed to take earnings of twin middle, so so far because it is going to problem your processor will fall in need of the two Ghz requirement

2016-12-18 12:59:16 · answer #2 · answered by barsky 4 · 0 0

Core Duo 1.86 GHz

2007-06-03 11:19:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The P4 will be faster if you're running a single thread app because of the advantage in clock speed. If you're running multithreaded and/or multiple programs at the same time, then the core duo is faster.

2007-06-03 11:25:21 · answer #4 · answered by Ted B 6 · 1 0

Core2 Duo is the one. It has better architecture that is designed to do more per clock cycle and at LOWER WATTAGE.

P4 3.0 is just Ghz speed, not processing speed. It is also fast in producing HEAT. 95W vs 65W of C2D. Check it out here. Use the E6400 since E6300 is not in the chart, then just interpolate.
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&model1=433&model2=457&chart=187

2007-06-03 12:25:59 · answer #5 · answered by Karz 7 · 0 0

Of course core duo.

2007-06-03 11:24:05 · answer #6 · answered by The EMA 3 · 0 0

I have to say the core 2 duo is faster.
I upgraded from a P4 3.6GHz to a E6600 (C2D 2.4GHz). The performance boost is incredible to say the least.

2007-06-03 11:21:41 · answer #7 · answered by INOA 7 · 1 0

core duo

2007-06-03 11:19:18 · answer #8 · answered by ☺☻☺☻ 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers