Do you want Bush to win or not?
2007-06-03 03:42:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Worse than Bush leaving his mess for the next president would be another major catastrophe, or false-flag operation, one worse than 9/11 even, which Bush would use to suspend the next election, so that he may take control of all branches of government, and 'ensure' constitutional rule until he dies...
He seems to have been heading that way for years now, one-man rule for America, that's the whole philosophy that his handlers have been, quite successfully, promoting, now this takes the cake...
Bush Anoints Himself as the Insurer of Constitutional Government in Emergency...
"With scarcely a mention in the mainstream media, President Bush has ordered up a plan for responding to a catastrophic attack.
In a new National Security Presidential Directive, Bush lays out his plans for dealing with a “catastrophic emergency.”
Under that plan, he entrusts himself with leading the entire federal government, not just the Executive Branch. And he gives himself the responsibility “for ensuring constitutional government.”
http://www.progressive.org/mag_wx051807
Quite a lot to entrust or 'anoint' oneself with, for someone whose legitimacy as president has been suspect from day one, and who seems to have nothing but contempt for the Constitution and Bill of Rights...
With Bush, "all options," are always "on the table," no matter how psychopathic.
Impeach now, why take chances? If it's good enough for Nixon and Clinton, it's gotta be good enough for Bush.
2007-06-03 03:55:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by dontknow772002 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, a fashionable protection tension makes use of a /lot/ of petroleum products, fairly in an invasion, so i'm confident it became a significant problem. Any revenue reaped via oil companies from contracts in Iraq would be miniscule while in comparison with the expenses of the conflict. the genuine place oil performs is as a strategic source. united statesa. has no determination yet to maintain a good protection tension presence interior the midsection east, to gaurantee it is furnish of oil. through fact, with out that furnish, it is protection tension would would be in general undercut. previous to the 2nd Iraq conflict, that presence risk-free Saudi Arabia. it is been moved to Iraq.
2016-11-03 12:39:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by bellville 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well he has had a lot of practice at other peoples expense for four (4*) years ... Why would he not leave a mess that he created in the first place? We all would be better off if BUSH had DIED in his Sleep of natural causes Ten (10*) years ago....
2007-06-03 03:52:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, like the way Bill Clinton left the mess for Bush, after Bin Laden bombed the WTC the first time, as well as the USS COLE, AND EMBASSIES BOMBINGS , which led to 9-11??...No, Bush wouldn't do that...
2007-06-03 04:06:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by BAARAAACK 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, indeed ! It will be his present to the future presidents be they REP / DEM . It will be the LEGACY he has been trying to achieve in his two terms of office .
2007-06-03 03:54:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by 1wiseguy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably. It's going to be a major election issue.
2007-06-03 03:42:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
That mess will be around for the next THREE presidents to clean up.
Not to mention his domestic policy disasters.
2007-06-03 03:43:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Radical Islamist terrorism existed many centuries before President George W. Bush was born and will exist long after he is retired, dead, and buried.
They will be pleased to shoot, torture, blow up, or behead you and all other "infidels" any time we relax and give them the chance. Sleep well tonight.
2007-06-03 03:50:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by senior citizen 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Probably.
2007-06-03 03:42:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋