Do we want national health care in America?

Question

The USA was the very first nation founded on this planet with a government by the people and for the people. In other words, this is the first country in which each individual shares the power that was once concentrated to an elite group, a king or other such form of rule.
To insure that each individual maintained the power that was once held by a king, capitalism was adopted as the economic system. Capitalism is individual ownership and control of wealth. Every other system, including socialism, the ownership and control of wealth is ceded to the state.
Socialism is just an extension of feudalism. Instead of a king controlling the wealth of the nation, a committee controls the wealth of the nation.
In both socialism and feudalism, the common man is allowed to advance in life only as far as the state permits. In both of these systems common people are not allowed to acquire personal wealth beyond which the state deems possible.
Once you cede power to the state to provide your individual personal needs, like healthcare, you have lost your freedom.
Listen to Hillary Clinton speak. She is touting socialism in this country. In each of her speeches, she states she want to tax the rich, create a huge government program, and provide socialized medicine. Think this thru. She wants to cap the wealth individuals can acquire. She was to be able to coerce or control your life by giving you free services. How do you think these free services will work out?
Look at the Social Security system. Every benefit SS people get is dictated by a committee. People on Social Security receive only the return that a committee sees fit. Limits are placed on the incomes of SS receivers. They are forced to live on a fix income or lose the benefits. And, if you decide to keep working because you can't live on SS, you must keep paying into the system even if you don't get any benefits.
Americans don't get free healthcare because Americans love freedom and liberty.
Think about this also. Why create a huge department of the government that will cost hundreds of millions of dollars to administer a national healthcare system? Why not just require every American to get coverage on their own? Creating a healthcare department is like you hiring someone to come to your house every morning to brush your teeth for you. Why pay for the adnimistrative expense of something you can take care of on your own?

Answer 1

Only if you want sub-standard care, don't mind waiting for months to get procedures done, don't mind losing physicians who specialize, and don't mind having Dr's who are severely overworked.

Don, below me. Guns aren't given to us by the government. :)

Answer 2

Absolutely not. The main reason is that this will cause medical innovation and technical progress to slow. If the government runs the health care system, competition is taken out of the equation and there is little motivation for individuals or companies to spend large quantities of time and effort researching things that may not even pan out. It is imperative that medical research not be impaired in any way and if you think government grants or tax breaks will make up for the potential windfall to be reaped in the event of the discovery of a new, successful drug or other innovation, then you need to pay more attention to history. Also, the government, with its enormous bureaucracy, is the least efficient vehicle to do anything other than national defense. So in short, use the private sector at all costs.

Answer 3

Capitalism only works when American digs into the truth of it and that's going back to the Declaration of Independents.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
By giving up rights, especially when it has to do with 100% of my health care would go against the grain of our true American beliefs.
Capitalism is the only way you can enjoy the fruits this Land has to offer and our forefathers were smart enough to see it.
Healthcare could definatley use a overhaul, starting with our elected officials to stop the abuse of the healthcare system. Not control it but watch over it.

Answer 4

How are unlawful immigrants miking it in united statesa.? often they are very detrimental and stay in low earnings aspects How have they affected united statesa.'s crime value? most of the illegals delivery drugs into united statesa. What reward/privileges do they acquire? (reward) Little to none. Many are deported whilst they are caught. How have they affected united statesa.'s acceptance? They bigger it even though it often isn't recorded as illegals on no account answer the census. How have they affected united statesa.'s economic device? they have presented a source for actual exertions. probable the only stable element that comes from unlawful immigrants Why do immigrants come to united statesa. illegally? They nevertheless pay attention the memories of united statesa. being a land the place the streets are paved with gold. in actuality they decide directly to advance their time-honored of residing. What i don't comprehend is why is it so freaking complicated to go into the country legally and alter right into a citizen? tens of millions of folk have carried out it interior the previous and thousands do it always happening. Why can no longer illegals parent it out? Is it properly well worth the money to attempt to stay away from immigrants from coming right here illegally? Is it properly worth scuffling with deaths brought about by utilising the persevered drug conflict? How is it conceivable for them to get jobs in the event that they have not got papers? (registered legally) Many companies which contain landscaping do no longer care in the event that they are unlawful or no longer. they only decide on human beings they are able to pay affordably for complicated artwork. in actuality the significant issue with illegals is ailment. Many enter the country with flu and much greater terrible circumstances. Many professionals assume that that's basically a remember of time before united statesa. gets ravaged by utilising a detrimental ailment triggered by utilising immigration.

Answer 5

This is a great question/statement. The world really isn't as complicated as the politicians want it to seem. In government just as in life some things are simple. My son did something wrong once and I took his car for a week. He complained "that's mine and you can't take it". I had to remind him I paid for it and I am still paying for it so I have the final decision.

That is what you are saying and that is the real truth. If you take from the government they have a say in what you do. Plain and simple. The more you take the stronger their control and the freedom and liberty are gone.

Answer 6

We already have national health care Bob.

You know the drill, need medical attention go to an ER, you will be taken care of regardless of ability to pay. Now what is wrong with that?

Instead of always calling it National Health Care, wouldn't it be more honest to call FREE health care, because that is what you are really saying isn't it?

I do not want the congress or the government anywhere near my health care, they can do nothing right and the only thing they do reasonably well is our military although that is flawed when the congress gets near it.

Answer 7

Every health insurance company in america costs millions of dollars to run every year and that is for each of them. They also make millions of dollars in profits every year and that is each of them. The CEO's of every company get millions of dollars in salaries and bonuses. Not a penny of this money actually goes to medication or health care for the patient. Not a penny of this money goes to the doctors or hospitals or pharmacies. In my opinion its billions of dollars that could be. If our system of malpractice lawsuits were done away with, doctors who pay half their income in malpractice insurance would not have to do so. Meaning they could be paid half of what they make now and still make the same. Same for hospitals. This would dramatically slash the cost of health care. Make doctors criminally liable for negligence in their profession. The idea of jail time might make them a little more careful. The fact that doctor's incomes would not decrease keeps quality physicians in the system and the criminal liability gets rid of the bad ones and motivates the ones on the fence. If every penny that were paid every year into health insurance, by subscribers, their employers in co-payments and premiums and dedutcables went in to a national health care fund everyone would have access to top quality health care. These are only a couple of suggestions for changes that would need to occur in order for us to have a successful health care program for everyone. I guarantee you every poor man woman and child already gets quality health care at the taxpayers expense. Pool all the money that goes to insurance companies, control healthcare costs especially drug costs, keep it simple and it would work. I work my tail off, I pay huge insurance premiums and co-payments and deductables and get very poor health care. People on welfare get better care than my family does. You tell me why that is. And how your plan would correct that.

Answer 8

We do have the best health care still in the world but it looks like this to can change soon, take good care of your health, in other words take a number and maybe we can help you but do not hold your breath. This is very scary subject if only people did their homework to find out the truth.
Yes you said it, it's called "freedom"

Answer 9

The majority of Americans favor universal health care.

It is a matter of concern to most Americans and the rising costs are worrisome to individuals and to employers. All other major industrialized countries provide health care for all of their citizens, so we have experience and history to review when deciding on what type of universal health care would be best for this country.

Answer 10

Only those who want someone else to pay their bills for them.