Should a husband be allowed to insure his wife?

Question

Seeing as a wife becomes her husbands property when married, should a husband be allowed to insure her along side all of the other objects he owns? No special category, just the usual fire, theft, flood and collison.

That way, when the wife crashes the car with her poor driving, the poor husband can atleast sue the other driver (or her husband, if she's married) with property damage.

What do I care how much a wife makes, stocks and bonds make money for their owners, why can't the wife?

Rio: How ironic, you are the last person who should comment on people being considered property. You admitedly sleep with men for personal satisfiction sans emotional attachment, yes? Last I checked, masterbatoral aids were considered property, and if nothing else, objects.

Answer 1

Such a caring man you are, oh a girl would be proud to be yours. All that loving care you are displaying.....of course you don't want to appear that way; only I can see the good in the bad, so you'd best get used to it.

Answer 2

interior the u . s . a ., it relies upon plenty on the insurance business enterprise. My business enterprise could enable me to force my Daughters vehicle at not greater can charge. I too, could be suspicious approximately what you have been informed. You have been informed wisely on your different concern approximately being Husband and spouse. I propose which you carry out a little serious identifying to purchase for a clean insurer. of course in case you're actually not interior the u . s . a ., my clarification would not inevitably persist with.

Answer 3

1. Women are LESS likely to crash an automobile. You were just complaining that our car insurance rates were lower - get it straight.
2. Either a husband or a wife has a right to take out a life insurance policy on the other. Employers also have the right to take out their own insurance policies on their employees. This has nothing to do with property law.

Answer 4

Yes, for life insurance especially. However since men have more accidents and die at a younger age, it is more important for the wife to have insurance on her husband, not the other way around. And it is almost impossible for a man to hire the many people needed to replace a wife, such as , mother, homemaker. cook, van driver for children's sports, accountant etc.

Answer 5

Huh?????
Just what sort of flame war are you trying to start in here?

In the Modern, Western, Judeo-Christian world married women are property of NO MAN. Women are not property.

Good grief.

So there!

Yours is one of the MOST IDIOTIC questions I've seen in this site in ages.

Answer 6

Yes, it's called life insurance and health insurance.
It protects you from financial damage upon incident.
The same applies for a question asked with the gender roles reversed.

Answer 7

What century do you live in? Property???? Wake up & smell the coffee, son. I was the breadwinner for BOTH of my marriages. Does that make them MY property? How about bigamy? I could use several husbands.....one who's good at fixing things, one who's good at lawn care, more than one who are good in other areas......

Answer 8

You are getting homeowners, life, and car insurance mixed
up.
You can get life insurance for your wife, but when you mention
"poor" husband in your sentence. Don't let anything anything
"happen" to her. They will find out .

Answer 9

You are definitely living in the fifties. No human being should ever be considered property.

Answer 10

The data collected the last 30 years tells us that it's far more likely for the man to be the cause of a traffic accident (or accident of any kind, for that matter).