http://kucinich.us/
I was really impressed by what I read on this site. A Department of Peace makes a lot more sense than selling munitions to other nations, and then calling them terrorists after you set them up and the Pres. and VP put the dollars in their pocket. This is criminal activity at its lowest, but most people are too dull to even recognize this. We put a murderer on death row, yet we elect politicians who kill thousands of people for their own greed ?
Its well known that Bush and Cheney make big bucks in the warfare industry. It should be a law that a political leader not be allowed to have any vested interest in producing military equipment.
Of course this is just the tip of the iceburg. As long as any of us support the slaughterhouse industry, we are creating the karma for future wars, what to speak of murdering children in abortion.
Dennis Kucinich is one of the first and only candidates that gives me any hope. Lets pray if elected, he does not get corrupted
2007-06-02 16:52:51 · 19 answers · asked by Gaura 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No Ron Paul is
2007-06-02 17:00:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 8⤋
Yeah, Kucinich is OK. Mike Gravel seems pretty darn good too! Ron Paul has some great things too say, but I certainly don't agree with him on everything. Dodd isn't bad either.
Unfortunately, none of these candidates are likely to win nominations. Granted, they are far from perfect, but they are a hell of a lot better than the favorites. But, come election day, we'll probably be stuck deciding between two idiots again...the corporate interests, lobbyists, and the mainstream media (as Peace 4 All mentioned a few posts above) will make sure of that. We'll have choices like Obama, Hillary, Romney, or that gutless, idiotic turd Giuliani. What'll ya have? A turd sandwich or a $hitburger? Just another typical election...
2007-06-02 21:37:28 · answer #2 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not a chance he will even get mentioned by the media.
Heaven forbid we elect a president who is sane, makes sense, and actually cares about the citizens of the United States! It would make this current administration look even worse.
I thought these people were running for office, not in a contest about who raises the most money.
2007-06-03 19:48:01 · answer #3 · answered by Eyes 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What makes something called something. somebody got here up with a popularity for human beings and now we mutually call ourselves human beings (so a techniques as English is worried). How are we diverse from different issues? we glance diverse, we've diverse genes, we've diverse purposes, and a few could say we won the breath of existence from God. What makes us human contained in the eastern way of questioning? A human that conforms to the societal norms. Even the bible says you're a beast in case you provide your self as much as sin.
2016-10-06 13:06:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kucinich looks like a troll and will never get elected. Only the morons in Ohio could elect such a pathetic excuse for a man.
2007-06-02 20:52:27 · answer #5 · answered by John 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Kucinich has no chance to be elected just like Ron Paul.
No chance in the US. Try the moon or mars.
2007-06-03 09:44:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Will,you are right about bush an no shooting chaney,they are just like LBJ but do not worry kucinich can not get elected as a dog caughtcher
2007-06-02 18:44:32 · answer #7 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not at all. People who think the way you describe him are suicidal in the face of our enemies. And this accusation that we "sell munitions to other nations, and then call them terrorists after you set them up" is a load of crap!
2007-06-02 17:44:41 · answer #8 · answered by ddey65 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I like Kucinich, but hes a bit too much of an idealist for my taste.
I'm supporting former Senator Mike Gravel. If you like Kucinich you'll probably like Gravel.
You should at least check out all the candidates before making you choice of who to support. I'm not telling you who to support, just suggesting that you make an informed decision.
http://www.Gravel2008.us
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gMlHv2lDqA ( Highlights of Gravel at the first Democratic debate. He gets pretty angry at points. Lord knows I wouldve too if I had been there)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c5ptT5j-zk (A much calmer Gravel being interviewed on CNN)
2007-06-02 17:17:31 · answer #9 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think Kicinich is a good man, noble, idealistic, fair, and uncorrupted.
Unfortunately, that's why he'll never win: he'll never be able to raise the money - since he can't be bought.
He is exactly the sort of man that the office of the President needs - and thus totally unlikely to ever get there.
I think John Edwards is not as 'clean' as Kucinich, but he's better than Hillary or Obama, and he's got a chance at winning. So I'm pulling for him.
2007-06-02 17:22:21 · answer #10 · answered by Chredon 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
His wife is way hot. At least we shouldn't have the Lewinsky thing again.
2007-06-02 16:56:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋