At the last inning it was 0 -17
culture of corruption, bwah aha ha ahaha aha.
lets see there is
reids fine real estate investment
feinstein steering 40 mil to her companies
pelosi and tuna gate
clinton and infousa and fund raising crimes
murtha on tape offering influence for cash
jefferson, cold cash jefferson
and the list goes on and on.
if you consider the millions of dollars the demwits have spent since in control of congress, they have not moved on a single issue of corruption in congress.
gee i guess they lied, but at least no one died, not yet anyway, there is still the issue of hillary and obama, you do know why obama asked for protection don't you.
2007-06-03 10:29:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm disappointed in her. After all the hype about her being a "San Francisco liberal," I expected her to impeach Bush and Cheney, thus becoming President herself. I lived in the Bay Area, and that's what an S.F. liberal would do. Ethical? Probably not. Best thing for the country? Definitely. Instead, she excludes impeachment, wimps out on ending the war, and shows up at the White House on time every week to receive orders from her master. Have ethics in Congress improved? I dunno, but you hear less about K Street than you did a year ago. Most likely, they've gone underground.
2007-06-02 22:17:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Who Else? 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
I've not heard of any huge investigations where people could go to jail in congress since the dems took over?
seems to be going pretty well vs. the prior leadership...
I've not seen anyone cite anything that says otherwise in this question so far?
2007-06-03 00:35:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
A thing cannot return to a place it has never been.
Oh, and it's not about non-Democrats? I guess all those non-Democrats in jail, indicted, or under investigation were either just ethically flexible or were framed?
2007-06-02 21:49:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by sonyack 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
It is unethical to request a larger personal jet on the taxpayers dime.
It is unethical to load a bill with 100/2 of millions of tacpayer $$ just to get a bill passed that will starve our troops.
It is unethical to not keep your word.
2007-06-03 03:03:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by cadcommando2003 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Justice department and the FBI have about 12 active investigations. 2 are democrats and the rest are Republicans.
Oh and while you are trying to make Democrats out to be corrupt, please remember Republican congressman Ney and Cunningham, both who were so ethical they needed to do prison time.
2007-06-02 22:04:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by arvis3 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
I would suggest that there are those who are not all that ethical on both sides of the aisle. You will recall all the "R" senators that ar resigning etc for misconduct????
2007-06-02 21:52:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ask Alberto Gonzales how his career is going right now. Notice I didn't say the R word.
2007-06-02 21:46:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Can Nancy Pelosi snap her fingers and magically make that happen?
OR
Does it take more than one person in Congress to bring about reform?
That's a really stupid question I have to say. No one person can bring about radical change in our government. It takes cooperation.
You've let your disdain of her cloud your thinking.
2007-06-02 21:43:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Josh 4
·
3⤊
5⤋
i just come here to see the show,,not a dem for damn sure
2007-06-02 22:37:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by jose 3
·
0⤊
1⤋