2007-06-02 14:14:31 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
His administration has been extremely secretive; sometimes justifiably and in other instances not justified. This has worked against him in the eyes of many people. As an example, the secret energy bill meetings with oil execs. In times like these, that took a huge toll on his administration's credibility.
I believe, in his mind, he is the parent of the country and he doesn't really feel the need to explain his actions to the taxpayers. That could be construed as a very bad attitude in his position unless you happen to trust him blindly and completely, which most do not.
2007-06-02 14:41:45 · answer #1 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The president campaigned on his abilities to delegate duties to others. The problems you are addressing are problems that you find when you delegate to the wrong people and trust and support them at all cost. It is plain and simple bad judgment. Mr. Bush is the final responsible agent of the people but the advisers are at fault. Some have resigned and the rest are going to be ineffectual.
2007-06-02 21:34:07 · answer #2 · answered by Pablo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All of the above... He also strikes me as only liking the perks and fame but NOT the criticism and actual work (he was like this in the governor's office inTexas but in those days he never had a any real disasters to contend with... also, the governor is not as powerful as people think so he was actually quite well-suited for that job... this one, way out of his league).
2007-06-02 21:35:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-06-02 21:28:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Please learn how to write a coherent question before trying to criticize the education or communication skills of others.
2007-06-02 21:20:59 · answer #5 · answered by Jim 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋