Newt Gingrich running w/ Tommy Thompson
or
Al Gore running with Obama
Remember....NO CHANGING the names to
who you think or want...it has to be between
Newt or Al Gore!!!
If you vote for Newt...state your reasons for doing so!
2007-06-02 13:06:38 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Newt, the thrown out of the senate leadership , Gingrich, and mr Conservative, Tommy! Don't make me laugh!
Eighty four ethics charges were filed against Speaker Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes and using the GOPAC political action committee as a slush fund; see Joseph Gaylord. Gingrich retained former U.S. Representative Edwin Bethune of Arkansas, a Washington, D.C., lawyer and lobbyist, to represent him.
Following an investigation by the House Ethics Committee, Gingrich admitted that he had violated House rules and accepted the house committee's recommendation for punishment. Gingrich was sanctioned for $300,000 after the House Ethics Committee concluded that his use of tax-deductible money for political purposes and inaccurate information supplied to investigators represented "intentional or . . . reckless" disregard of House rules Special Counsel James M. Cole concluded that Gingrich violated federal tax law and had lied to the ethics panel in an effort to force the committee to dismiss the complaint against him.
Al Gore I would vote for!
Who do you work for anyway?
2007-06-02 13:24:13 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 7⤋
Newt and Tommy.
Of course, my choice would be Obama with Thompson, if I had to choose from among those 4, but I think Newt might...er...I dunno. Basically, I think Al Gore is an authoritarian nutjob, and I can't fathom how anyone could ever consider voting for him under any circumstances. Have you read Earth in the Balance? It's all about how he wants to totally run our lives. It was really scary 8 years ago when he wrote it. Now, under Bush, it may not seem like such a big change, but really, this used to be a free country!
2007-06-02 13:12:09 · answer #2 · answered by skip742 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
nonetheless vote casting for Obama. a) Making propaganda for the enemy whilst we are AT conflict is far worse than terrorism, that is TREASON - and McCain is responsible of it. he's on no account denied it. He admitted to being a terrorist in writing (whether we weren't employing the observe decrease back then). b) The underlying reason for the failure of the financial equipment is the conflict - and that is McBush who's responsible for that. And the elder McBush (the only working, no longer the present lame duck), is claiming that the conflict is a sturdy factor. (i assume like Palin's daughter being unwed and pregnant is a sturdy factor - however the different unwed 17 twelve months previous unwed lady who's pregnant is a slut, huh?) c) Palin had the criminal acceptable to fire *Monegan*. She had no criminal acceptable to reserve a trooper fired (or disciplined in any way) - that's a contravention of Alaskan regulation. Oh - her purely flaw? Get a reproduction of _Susan Slade_ and watch it. (Connie grew to become into far prettier than Bristol, in that functionality.) So, to a Republican, mendacity by one's enamel isn't a flaw? Or that is purely no longer a flaw while you're a Repub-lie-can? that's time IOKIYAR grew to become right into a reason for indictment, no longer election.
2016-12-30 14:57:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Newt hands down, because he understands that this country is run by the people who need to stay free and the least taxes the better off we will all be. Al Gore to me with his movie and book have proved that he is more looney tunes then I thought he was before. If the Dems win it was a just and fair election if the Repo's win it was rigged again!! lol
2007-06-02 13:14:15 · answer #4 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Newt, because I really do not like Al Gore and Obama is a no experienced kid who has no business on the ticket anyway.
2007-06-02 13:10:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
gee what a difficult choice...lets see al gore is nuts,so he is a no no.Newt is brilliant and aggressive,hmmm -hey lets go for NEWT!!!! here is the realty,Newt will not make it because of too much baggage that the libs will exploit without end.He may have a chance as a VP.my choice is Fred Thompson.
2007-06-02 13:35:37 · answer #6 · answered by dumbuster 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Duh! Newt/Thompson! Newt is one of the most brilliant political minds in recent history and (my former governor) Tommy Thompson did wonders for welfare reform in Wisconsin. He BTW, left his position as Sec of HHS due to policy differences with Bush......which should be a plus with the more liberal conservatives among us. But Newt, unfortunately is unelectable so he will just have to settle for the Sec of State position when the republicans win in 08!
2007-06-02 14:14:07 · answer #7 · answered by Cherie 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I'd vote for the Republican ticket, because I'm a Republican. With those candidates, or any other major candidates. The differences between the major candidates within each party are insignificant compared to the differences between the parties.
2007-06-02 13:10:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
The government does not limit me to two choices on the ballot; neither will you. I feel sure Ron Paul will be on the ballot and I will vote for him. For me to vote for candidates that I do not want is the ultimate waste of my vote. People voting for the lesser of two evils is why we have such an evil government.
2007-06-02 13:55:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
whos the green party candidate? I have nothing against obama but al gore? pleaseeeeee. i am also never voting for a republican.
2007-06-02 13:12:14 · answer #10 · answered by Wendy G 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋