Suppose 'some' man wants to lodge a complaint of 'some' case of bribery which happened 2 yrs back.
And this man was eye witness of that case of bribery happened 2 yrs back.
The amount of money what 'some' accused accepted from 'some' person in that case was too small to create any disproportion in his property , inside his known source of income.
There was not any criminal misconduct.
Now that accused has stopped demanding and accepting bribe from 1 year.....Means now he can't be catched RED HANDED.
Will A.C.B. deny to take this complaint ?
Is it impossible now to punish that accused for the bribery, which he demanded & accepted 2 yrs back IN SUCH CASE , in INDIA?
2007-06-02 11:47:51 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
their is no provision against govt bribe takers only givers can be arrested the law we have is copied as it is from british rule which govt cannot be punished only the poor are punished
2007-06-03 09:37:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prescription of crime is crucial in this case, verify with your laws the period of prescription for bribery. If prescription has not set in, file the complaint and together with the testimony of the eyewitness together with corroborating evidence.
2007-06-02 19:13:55 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋