Ever hear of ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION??!?
Even if his marriage is all a big PR sham, and him & Katie don't even really SLEEP together, that doesn't mean he didn't still want to have kids. I think the kid IS his, and that was the whole purpose of the marital union; to protect his "hetero" image, and produce heirs!
With gayness running rampant these days as it is, I wouldn't be one BIT surprised to find out eventually that Tom was "one of them" all along! Women have long been used as covers for gay men trying to build up their careers. Just ask Rock Hudson, who so successfully duped all but the Hollywood "insiders" for DECADES! But these days, we have ways of producing off-spring with NO SEX involved, and I think TomKat has a special little "agreement" going on! Perhaps one day, all will be revealed....
2007-06-02 09:35:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ridiculous question. OF course Suri belongs to her father Tom Cruise. That baby looks just like Tom and Katie. Chris Klein doesnt even feature into the picture.
2007-06-02 22:00:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by mystic rain 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Suri Cruise is definitely the daughter of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes. In fact, Katie says that she wants to have more children with Tom.
2007-06-02 16:21:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Louise Smith 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
If Tom Cruise had any doubts that the child was his he would have had a DNA test - do you not think
Stop believing everything you read in the tabloids
2007-06-02 16:11:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Redhead 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think it's his. She has his eyes. But there was a lot of debate about this issue for a while which was why the tabloids made such a big deal about it.
2007-06-02 16:13:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by sublime_tendencies 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is ridiculous,of course she's Tom's.
2007-06-02 16:10:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by thirsty mind 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
You mean you actually believe she exists.....?
2007-06-02 16:16:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Greg 7
·
1⤊
1⤋