If the far right again have a candidate in the white house in 2008?

Question

will they continue to blame the "libs" for everything while they simultaneously screw up everything that they touch?

thank you "libstalker" for the great ex. of everything that is wrong with the far right, you people are incapable of taking any responsibility for anything

"bush is not far right"

har har, that's good, tell me another one

Answer 1

No.

Answer 2

OK, if by "far right" you mean someone like Bush, and by "libs" you mean someone different than Bush, then maybe I can answer your question.

The problem is that your terminology is all turned around. Bush is a typical leftist. High spending, interventionist foreign policy, undeclared wars, inflationary monetary policy, lots of new regulations on our personal lives here at home, etc. The only difference is that he cut taxes, but anyone with a lick of sense knows that a tax cut without a spending cut is just going to mean higher taxes in the future.

Trouble is, most of the newer Republicans aren't that adept at thinking through policy decisions, so they've been duped. And they know that what the left has to offer can only be worse. So they're left trying to put up with Bush.

There's a distinct remnant within the Republican party who DOES want a big change from the Bush league, and they represent some of the people who are hoping that someone outside the mainstream of the party will catch on in this election. Many of us are supporting Dr. Ron Paul, and there are others who are still waiting on the sidelines hoping for another candidate. I like Congressman Paul, not only because of his anti-Iraq War stance, but because I really believe Dr. Paul is the best representative of true Republican principles. He represents an "Old Right" approach similar to Reagan's: limited government, low taxes and spending, non-inflationary monetary policy, non-interventionist foreign policy, a responsible immigration system, and a focus on personal responsibility and individual freedom.

So, if that's "far right" to you, then yes...I'll continue to blame the "libs", including Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, as well as George Bush, Rudy Giuliani, and Mitt Romney, for all the things that are screwed up.

Answer 3

I personally don't think we'll see a Conservative in the White House but after the sellout of Democrats in regards to supporting the war financially and the time line betrayal, I must emphasize focusing on a third party candidate. The two present major political parties are in the pockets of Corporate America and I associate them with Fascism and Fascism lite.

Answer 4

No the White House is untouchable for a Far Right Candidate in 2008. Courtesy of the Bush administration!

Answer 5

The right gets blamed by the left...you have it backwards, and they pin everything on one man and then blame the right for supporting him...if your gonna make statements then at least use facts.

and BTW...it's not IF, it's when!

Answer 6

If the Far right is a candidate in white house in 2008 it will go to prove that US elections are fraud and the electronic voting machines have once again done their job...

As far as blaming the libs ..it is only when theyFar right / Republicans are put in a spot they will question everything from commitment to support troops, patriotism, pro-life stand ..and will keep on stripping everyone of their rights and scaring them into submission. That is what the far right is for - I think of them as Jesus carrying a gun ..killing all the prochoice , gays and lesbians ...while getting paid from lobbyiest to make all the citizens captive consumers of their toxic products...from food to fast cars..

Answer 7

Gee, I sure hope so!

So far, the only blaming that I see going around is the Democrats trying to blame all the world's ills on one man, President George W. Bush. Their only political platform to run on in 2008? "Get us out of Iraq and Bush out of office". Wow, how profound! Just WHAT else will these idiots do when (or if) they ever get the Presidency again? At some point, they have to provide some leadership for our country's future. You can't just take your ball and go home when you don't like how the game is played.

Answer 8

Yes. They are supporting Mr. Law and Order now. He had the reputation of being the laziest Senator in the house in Washington. He never liked to work past 2 in the afternoon. He never initiated a bill. He would do pretty much the same if elected and we would be mired worse than we already are. The cons would still blame it on Bill, they will say 8 years wasn't long enough to straighten out Bill's mess. LOL

Answer 9

First, Bush is not far right. Second, let's hope that happens or we're in big trouble. Third, I believe it is Bush who is blamed for everything, including the lack of condoms in Uganda. I actually saw that on, where else, CNN. Third, what have we "screwed up?" Being accused of screwing up and actually screwing up are two entirely different things, especially in the liberal mind.

Answer 10

No, they do not have a White House Candidate. Sure blame it all on the Democrats because in 3 months they can't undo what it has taken Dumbo 6 years to mess up , everything. "It's very wearing , It hurts George and myself more than anyone when each troops dies", Quoted Laura, Oh Sweet Laura. Hmmnnn.

Answer 11

I will just let your name explain all that is needed to know
about your question.

Give yourself the 10 Points