wouldnt the world be a better place if people lived 35 years instead of seventy?

Question

no overpopulation, less waste, less resources used, much less need for expensive healthcare.....etc etc etc.........no crabby old people driving on the wrong side of the road...ha

Hey sassy, instead of always whining about how women should have control over their bodies why dont they take some control and stop making kids that they dont want?

Answer 1

yeah...u are obviously very young!! That means I would only have 14 more years to live!
So young!

Answer 2

Dr. Kevorkian has been released from jail, send him an
email, I see no reason for you to wait until you are 35.

I would be laughing and rolling over in my grave to think
that this world could even survive with a population that
young. Who would teach the children? how many inventions
have come from someone younger than 35, what kind
of technological advances have been made by those
under the age of 35.

This world would look like Biafra looks today.

Answer 3

Considering most people don't have kids until they're in their mid-20's, who do you expect to raise all of these orphans? Nevermind that most of the large income generators (read: taxpayers) are over 30.
Of course if we only lived 35 years naturally (rather than being "offed" by the younger generation), then our biological clocks would shift to compromise and children would be having children while they were still just... you got it, children... All the same problems you're trying to avoid would just come faster and more often.
Babies having babies they don't know how to raise and can't support...
Sounds like a welfare state paradise.

Answer 4

the old people on the wrong side of the road might be true,but if people died at 35 you would have to start having kids at 15 to raise them right.and raising kids means not going to movies and that other crap teens do these days,not only that but the baby might come out retarded because the mom isn't matured yet to have a baby,also there wouldn't be any jobs,so no money.so yeah you think about this

Answer 5

Are you that ignorant? seriously let's name some accomplishments made by people UNDER 35 and then compare them to accomplishments of people OVER 35. You can't even run for president unless you are 35.

Our long life is what has enabled us to become the society we are today, if we had a shorter life span we would probably still be living in middle ages type of society.

Answer 6

By that logic I would already be dead. Thanx...by the way there wouldn't be crabby old people on the roads if young punk kids would learn to drive and be considerate!

Answer 7

No it's lack of predation that is allowing imbeciles to reproduce. In PreHistoric Times they would have died before reproducing. The Egyptians, Romans, Chinese all slaughtered whole races. Civilization is destroying humanity.

Answer 8

Your comments are very sad. It would be a better world if so many un-wanted children were not born. With all the birth control available today , there is no excuse. Also, perhaps the world would be a better place without people like you.

Answer 9

see the movie 'Logans Run' for your utopia

your question reflects an absolute lack of value for the individual vs the state

i hope you overcome it by the time you're 35

Answer 10

I have a feeling that someone 35 years old, looks very old to you-right?

Answer 11

actually it probably wouldn't be better. people who live longer can pass on amazong stories to their grandchildren and then that story gets passed on other reasons it isn't so great is because parts of canada is underpopulated like manitoba where i live. not many people are here and up north imagine there. anyways i ive in winterpeg manisnowba and we need more people here! rock on winnipeg! :P