NEGATIVE. its not the first time teammates fight. their professionals they should get over it and move on. Zambrano needs to find his groove. His velocity and arm level are off compared to last 2 years. something tells me rothschild has been working on "mechanics" again. They should get rid of him. Barret is a good catcher. going through a mini slump right now but everyone does. he'll get out of it. besides who's gonna replace barret, Blanco? hope not.
2007-06-02 06:01:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by chevereeddie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. Barrett is probably a top-five catcher in the National League, and Zambrano can be one of the better pitchers in the NL. What the Cubs need is a veteran pitcher on that staff to provide some leadership, because having a volatile personality like Zambrano as a number one starter is risky at best.
2007-06-02 10:05:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jason 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is not any protection that justifies Zambrano's habit. besides pitching very poorly this season, his temper has now gotten him and the group so far. What ever became bothering him would desire to and could have been dealt with at the back of closed doorways. Barrett have been given traded through fact he became no longer a good participant - even via Cubs' standards. He even have been given right into a controversy with pitcher wealthy Hill interior an identical '07 season. Zambrano lower back placed his thoughts formerly the interests of the group and he's misguided. Like Milton Bradley, he needs to bypass - notwithstanding if the Cubs ought to absorb maximum individuals of his settlement.
2016-11-03 10:28:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
They are both near free agency and the Cubs should get what they can now.
Zambrano has immense talent but does not do well under pressure. He is not taking the Cubs to a higher level.
Barrett is also a crazy hothead. He has had bad fights with Houston and the White Sox. He was wrong in both cases and did the team no good.
Top of the line pitching and receiving are difficult to replace. But waiting may not help a thing.
2007-06-02 06:02:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Menehune 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think both are free agents after the season, correct? If so, if they think they can actually re-sign either or both, don't trade. If they don't then they should.
Following yesterday's fight, I'm assuming neither one is going to want to be on the same team as the other one, so one of team is going to go for sure following the season.
Personally, if I have to pick, I'd rather see Barrett leave. He's a decent/good hitter, but I still think he's pretty bad on defense and I don't like the way he calls a game. Also, all those mental errors he keeps making (throwing BEHIND a runner, getting picked off base) aren't endearing himself to the management or the fans
2007-06-02 06:10:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by hulidoshi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should not trade them, the best reason being because Zambrano only has one year left on his contract. Barrett should not be traded because all he did was try to defend himself from that crazy bastard Zambano. Poor Carlos was probably just a little upset that he got shelled on his Birthday.
2007-06-02 06:34:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by horatio 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trade Zambrano to a real team.Barrett deserves to be on that team with the rest of the losers.What a pathetic organization.
2007-06-02 06:03:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Zambrano will be a Met or maybe even a yankee at this rate lol....
and Barrett is alright, he was sub a year ago...
2007-06-02 09:13:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mystery Man 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Zambrano should be suspended every pitcher has to take responsibility for the game they pitched I mean 13 hits pethedic and then takes it out on he catcher.
2007-06-02 06:38:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Girate 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope, neither one. They are both very solid players, and the Cubs need them both. What happened was a matter of tempers flaring up as they occasionally do.
Teammates and clubhouses have a way of being able to move on from these kind of things. This is not something that has not happened before.
2007-06-02 06:08:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by frenchy62 7
·
0⤊
1⤋