Oh no, we stopped another terrorist plot today on the JFK airport, and a few weeks ago we stopped the "Fort Dix six", and they both had some kind of interference (wiretaps, etc..)
2007-06-02 05:35:38 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Without these "Illegal" Wiretaps, we could have been attacked multiple times.
2007-06-02 05:36:22 · update #1
The green party replace the republican party? lol, i needed a good laugh, thanks igi.
2007-06-02 05:41:35 · update #2
Liberals are rushing right now to defend the terrorists.
2007-06-02 14:38:04 · answer #1 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If the liberals don't try to preserve the rights of the terrorists, who will vote for them in the next election? They're the kings and queens of divide and conquer, but the only thing they're really doing is dividing our country & making it easier for terrorists to take over. THANK YOU LIBERALS, CUZ I'VE ALWAYS WANTED MY COUNTRY TO BE RUN BY TERRORISTS. For those morons out there, that was sarcasm if you didn't catch on the first time.
2007-06-03 13:40:54 · answer #2 · answered by Roland'sMommy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither Fort Dix nor JFK Airport scares were caught using wire taps.... or any other government method.... they outted themselves
2007-06-02 13:22:22 · answer #3 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Stopping them before they do something is the right way.
Since the Bush administration was warned by the Clinton people about Al Qaeda and that OBL was planning something but the Bushies chose to ignore it. Had they done what is being done now and was done during the Clinton Admin. then the attacks on 9/11 probably wouldn't have happened. But that would not have enabled Dubya an opportunity to sell his BS war on Saddam whom he had a personal vendetta against.
What rights do you think someone is violating? Stupid, unfounded accusations just make you look bad. Other people know better. I really feel sorry for you.
You mention the Fort Dix Six. They were detected by a photo shop operator not wire taps. So much for your wire tap crap.
2007-06-02 12:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
Don't be ridiculous. In both cases they had beyond probable cause. In this case the guy who got the plot started told it to an FBI informant. I think wiretaps were just.
2007-06-02 12:41:16 · answer #5 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Interfere at will, I say!
Why do people get so bent out of shape over "rights?" If they aren't American they DON'T get my rights.
Moreover, if an American is getting calls from our enemy that American better be able to explain . . .
2007-06-02 15:05:28 · answer #6 · answered by Moneta_Lucina 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Liberals honestly believe an individual's rights are sacrosanct. Some honestly believe that terrorist rights are more important than our security. PATHETIC
2007-06-02 13:33:59 · answer #7 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
According to the Bush admin we are. This is why he feels they should ahve the right to own our sea ports or come across our open Mexican border or be given thousands of work visas a year to come here and work at our airports ;-)
2007-06-02 12:58:55 · answer #8 · answered by bettercockster1 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Honestly, the more time that goes by, the more I wonder if Lincoln's ideals and dreams of a united country were really that solid.
Maybe we would be better off as north and south, or Liberal, and everyone else, as it were.
Anything to get rid of their unending buzzing.
2007-06-02 12:40:20 · answer #9 · answered by Rationality is lost 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Not a liberal, but I support interfering with the rights of terrorists 100%.
2007-06-02 12:44:01 · answer #10 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 10⤊ 2⤋