compared to bush's WMD LIEs
2007-06-02 04:41:52 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
dum republican hoes
RICE ignored the fbi 911 report FACT
2007-06-02 04:54:15 · update #1
You know this is a great question and one that I pose to my right wing brother (who cheated on his wife and married the other woman) all the time. He goes on these long conversations on how Clinton lied. Yes...He lied...but he lied about getting a b.low j.ob which most men in this world have done.
But you make a great point....he didn't lie about weapons of mass destruction like Bush or become the cause of all of the deaths from this war due to his lie. All part of his fear tactics.
Thank you so much for putting this out there...though it will be shot down with hate it needs to seep in to everyone so that they can see it more clearly.
2007-06-03 07:05:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Impeaching Clinton was a pure partisan act...If the Dem's had that much control of congress as that held by the Republicans during Clinton's time, Bush would be back at the ranch sawing up dead trees and pretending to be a cowboy
2007-06-02 04:49:01 · answer #2 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
CLINTON LIED TO PRESIDENT BUSH ABOUT WMD TOO
Plus, the soldiers are Republicans by a 5:1 margin. No reason for Libs to concern themselves with soldiers. Libs should worry about their own kids in rehab who sit around getting high and playing video games all day.
2007-06-02 04:54:12 · answer #3 · answered by Kim 1 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Uno, you ask any Republican about Bush, question anything he does and he starts up about Clinton's BJ. They honestly equate that in their tiny little minds with the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocents in Iraq or with the deaths of so many good American soldiers. Either that or they start up well....they enlisted as if they deserve an incompetent commander and chief and to die. Their logic astounds me. They will justify anything and rationalize everything.
2007-06-02 04:45:46 · answer #4 · answered by kolacat17 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Funny how I never see soldiers or people in the military complaining. All I see are civilian armchair warriors. Think you can do a better job? Have at it. Run for office. If you have a decent plan, I will campaign to get you in. Until you come up with an idea to end all this, and a feasible one, I don't want to hear it.
2007-06-02 04:47:14 · answer #5 · answered by Sr. Mary Holywater 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Quite a few, because Clinton was worried about Lewinsky and what not, instead of finding Bin Laden before 9-11. Clinton could have prevented it, but did not. He had more than one opportunity of Bin Laden being given to him on a silver platter by a foreign government.
2007-06-02 04:45:57 · answer #6 · answered by Kalmad Jaheed Ali 2 · 2⤊ 6⤋
How many changed parties?
I know I did.
He was an embarrassment.
However, you can have Bush.
2007-06-02 04:45:39 · answer #7 · answered by DAR 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He lied under oath. That was the issue... Not deaths. Your question is idiotic
2007-06-02 05:00:03 · answer #8 · answered by redneckgirl98362 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
President Bush did not commit a crime -- he acted on the intelligence information that was gathered by the CIA. Clinton, on the other hand, commited perjury.
2007-06-02 04:47:12 · answer #9 · answered by Bill in Kansas 6 · 3⤊ 6⤋
clinton said the same thing or you didnt listen look on youtube say 1990 sadam clinton look before you say idiot.
2007-06-02 04:46:36 · answer #10 · answered by Jeremy P 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋