9/11 pics & videos pop up a lot of questions as 2 how did the towers pancake and blasted the columns all over?

Answer 1

2 airplanes full of fuel flying at 600 mph. It's simple logic.

Answer 2

Yeah especially WTC 7, which wasn't hit by a plane at all. This is the first time a fire has completely brought down a building, and the fire in one of the towers was about to die out when it collapsed. And there was no cave-in - they should have sunk down where the fire was, not all around, which would have tilted the buildings and made them collapse more unevenly than they did. Research this topic, and you'll find that there's a lot more evidence other than the towers collapsing that proves ppl in the govt were behind it.

Answer 3

The collapse of the WTC towers and how they fell has two main factors.

1) The World Trade Center towers had a unique structure.
The support beams were all on the outside of the building.
The trademark lines going up every few feet on the outside of the building was the support structure.

2)When metal reaches a certain temperature it is no longer able to Carry a load.
The heat of the burning jet fuel was able to reach the temperature easily.

With the load Bering members of the buildings loosing the ability to Carry the load and the fact that the buildings had what could best be called an exo skeleton.
The building were forced to collapse straight down.
But the collapse of the WTC towers fell on several buildings in the area.
If this was a controlled demolition that would not have happened.

Answer 4

Hi Kirk,

It was OBVIOUS CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

1. Rapid onset of “collapse”
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse (heard by hundreds of firemen and media reporters)
3. Symmetrical “collapse” – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance
4. Squibs, or “mistimed” explosions, at the upper 7 floors seen in the network videos
5. “Collapses” into its own footprint – with the steel skeleton broken up for shipment
6. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
7. Tons of molten Metal found by CDI (Demolition Contractor) in basement (no other possible source than an incendiary cutting charge such as Thermate)
8. Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
9. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
10. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
11. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
http://www.ae911truth.org/

Answer 5

susi has it right.

burning jet fuel shatters concrete and warps steel. [Doh! how did you think steel was made? By burning fossil fuels (coke from coal) which liquidifies the resulting steel so it can be poured into ingots and bars.]

Why weren't the towers designed to withstand the impact of a 50 to 80 tonne aircraft flying at 350 knots? [Maybe 20 tonnes of which is jet fuel, btw]

Ah ... better question.

And the answer is that no one imagined that a skyscraper could stand up to what amounts to a flying bomb. Certainly, every modern war since 1914 has shown that buildings [and ships] are vulnerable to aircraft dropped bombs.

***
Btw, did you read the Tom Clancy book in which a suicidal airline pilot flew his half-fueled 747 into the US Congress building and very nearly wiped out the US government??

You might check the copyright date of that book ... [August 1994 in hardback ... see the link]

Who says that Osama bin Laden doesn't read??

Answer 6

go to youtube and type in 9/11 conspiracy
or
type in loose change to watch a documentary about how the govt planned it years ago

You can also go here;
911myths.com
debunking911.com

I still dont know about the whole thing myself so the best thing to do is just go about you own opinion. Hope these help.

Answer 7

I’d like to respectfully add some information to some points that were raised here.

1. I don't know how you could not have rapid collapse once it starts.

2. Sounds during a heart-stopping collapse of a massive building can be deceiving. Most importantly, there is hard scientific evidence against explosions & this was publicly published in nationally respected journal “ImplosionWorld” You can see the entire article here:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

3. The WTC towers did not come down symmetrically. WTC7 was struck leaving a 10 story hole. Other buildings nearby were not hit.

4. I know of no footage of squibs. There were puffs of air. The WTC towers were mostly air, having an average density that’s less than balsa wood. This air has to go somewhere during pan-caking, The dust was simply due to air being expressed during pan-caking.

5. Experts say that the WTC did not fall into their footprint, and this is printed in the nationally acclaimed journal, Implosion World. Here’s the link

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

This article was written by the senior editor of Implosion World & by experts from Protec, one of the world’s most knowledgeable independent authorities on explosive demolition .

On page 4 it says, “Assertion #2 But they fell straight down into their own footprint. PROTECT COMMENT: They did not. They followed the path of least resistance.”

To the untrained eye the collapse might have looked like a fall into its own footprint, but this is partly an illusion due to the height of WTC1&2. Considerable spread occurred but was masked by the immense size of the towers & by obscuring dust. The cameras were huge distances from the collapsing buildings, further reducing your ability to see.

Protec was actually there, on-site during the collapse and they say (see article above, page 5), “significant amounts of heavy structural debris rained down for blocks around the site.”

In addition, debris struck WTC7 and took out a piece stretching up & down 10 stories.

6. All building collapses release massive amounts of dust (pyroclastic flow only comes from vocanos).

7. Molten metal-
Metallurgy experts disagree with this. Emertius Professor of Metallurgic Engineering at Lehigh University, Alan Pense, says, “The photographs shown to support melting steel are, to me, unconvincing…or show materials that appear to be other than steel. One of the photos appears to me to be mostly of glass with unmelted steel rods in it.” (Pop Mech, p 41). Many other experts say the same thing.

8. Jones made so many false statements about thermite being used in 9/11 that finally the editors at “Implosion World” contacted him. They cornered him with the facts. He admitted that his theories had many unexplained holes in it. He also admitted that none of the steel showed thermite’s “degenerative fingerprint.” See page 7, section 4 of http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

Thanks for listening & I hope this helps.

Answer 8

when the steel beams inside the towers became weak enough from the heat and the crash, they failed. the weight of all of the above floors, about 20-30 floors, dropped about 10 feet and landed on the uppermost, undamaged floor. this weight crushed it, causing a domino effect chain reaction. it proceeded all the way down, adding more weight as it went, and crushing each floor in sequence.

Answer 9

Only conspiracy theorists see a 9/11 consipiracy. The majority of us have read factual accounts of the events of the day and know that we were attacked by jihadist terrorists.

Answer 10

To me, they validate what most of us already knew, a bunch of terrorists flew large planes into them. Grow up.