1. To show the full body, I would copy or draw from a chart showing the different stages of early man, labeled by time period.
2. To make models, I would feature the "heads"/skulls only.
Take a styrofoam ball and poke a wire or stick in the bottom
to secure it to your display. Use modeling clay to shape the head and features around the ball to make the heads.
By just focusing on the heads, you can make simpler 3D models that allow a closeup of the features. You can separate each display, showing the picture of the full body, plus a description of the time period and differences in development.
The important thing I would emphasize is the size of the "brain" in relation to skills and language usage. So I would emphasize those changes with the head and facial features, and make these details very clear.
If you are doing a smaller scaled-down model, you can put the heads and the chart together on one display in sequence.
If you want to show more details on the heads, you can use either gray/brown/neutral colored clay and then add thread or fur for hair, etc. Or just use plain gray and use a toothpick to draw the textures.
It is more effective to model the eyebrows and eyes and nose as 3D as possible (and not to draw them on a flat surface). Like rolling a small ball for the eye, and imbedding it in an indention so it looks more realistic. People are naturally drawn to look at representations of people, so your display will be interesting and catch attention the more 3D it is.
I would look online for profiles or detailed head features, or look for a color chart at the library.
2007-06-02 02:59:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nghiem E 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution isn't in keeping with non secular ideals. that's in keeping with data. because of the fact of this that's taught in technological know-how instructions and creationism isn't. something of your questions seem to relax on the fake assumption you made interior the beginning up. multiple the "founding fathers of technological know-how" lived in a time once you need to get in extreme hardship for publicly doubting the Bible. seem what befell to Galileo. They knew completely nicely that they had to faux to have faith the Bible. it is likewise only no longer genuine that creationists and scientists only interpret the data in any different case. anybody who has relatively appeared on the data is established with how far off that concept is. you need to ignore approximately way too a lot to interpret a sprint data as help for specific creation.
2016-11-25 00:29:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by cunigan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1st you could use themacole & pzste chart on it.then with the help of p.o.p,means plaster of paris make figures of mans from the time of early mans.the pictures of early mans would be given in any of the 4 or 5th class student's s.s.t book.ok& if u need any more help.ask it rt. now.ok
2007-06-02 01:44:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋