English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean, hey, look at his job on the enviornment and the War in Iraq, plus his "commitment"
to bring healthcare to all. It seem like he enjoys taking life, instead of saving it.

2007-06-01 23:01:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

"Retard" is a verb, not a noun.

When you use the word as a noun, you make yourself sound retarded.

-----------------------

I think Bush is a reasonably intelligent man, but he certainly seems to lack wisdom. He has made a lot of mistakes, but I do not believe he enjoys taking lives.

VOTE IN THE PRIMARIES if you want there to be better choices come November '08!

2007-06-04 15:14:15 · answer #1 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 0 1

I'm a conservative and I don't agree with Bush on the environment.

However, the war on Iraq was a commitment made by a vast majority of Congress. Its funny how many liberals forget that and won't stand behind their decision. That's not how leaders should react!

On healthcare, Bush had a great plan to allow small business to group together to buy medical insurance for their employee's. He would also give tax incentives to companies that provided healthcare to their employees. That would have greatly reduced the number of uninsured and under insured. Unfortunately some people in this country feel they need socialized medicine even though it has worked poorly everywhere else its been tried.

I guess I can't expect others to be educated on these subjects. It's sad that you and others can't show honor and intelligence!

2007-06-02 00:49:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

all you have given us is your "opinion' which really doesn't amount to a row of beans. The environment problem has been going on long before Mr. Bush became president, the war in Iraq was voted for by YOUR CONGRESS and YOUR Hillary C. really wrecked a national health care proposal. Our President is doing the very best he can under monumental criticism from people like YOU who have no idea what he is handling! Back off!

2007-06-01 23:49:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I don't agree with everything the man has done either however I also realize that I don't have all the information he does and he is probably doing a far better job than I ever could. We Americans just love to sit back and complain and criticize everything because it's easy and safe. I guarantee you that had he done nothing and another 9/11 or similar event had happened the people would be screaming "why didn't you protect us". I don't know if what he are doing is right but I do know that doing nothing would have been wrong. So before you call him a retard put yourself in his shoes. It's not an easy job nor is any man perfect.

For the record we are going to fight these people somewhere. I would rather it be in Iraq or Afghanistan than New york City or Detroit.These people want to kill us and that includes you. If you don't believe that I would be happy to buy you a one way ticket to Baghdad. You won't need the return ticket.

2007-06-01 23:13:24 · answer #4 · answered by deniver2003 4 · 3 5

Be careful. It is said that you become what you hate. Any solutions? Why not use your power as an American citizen? Write to your state reps., Congresspeople, Senators, even the President. Vote. But if you can't come up with anything better than, "you're a retard" well, then you are a lost cause. Sorry, pal.

2007-06-01 23:41:29 · answer #5 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 2 2

He only appears to be a retard because everything he does is for his own selfish interests, not for those Americans who are working for minimum wage or living on Social Security. You probably wouldn't think he was a retard if you were a billionaire, or a large corporation. The rest of the world doesn't have any rose-colored glasses, they see the President for what he is

2007-06-01 23:36:45 · answer #6 · answered by William F. Torpey 2 · 2 3

why did it take you several years to post this question. You have to be referring to Bill Clinton and hes been out of office for some time now. George Bush has been president for several years and the reason Im thinking your mistakenly referring to Clinton is the mess left for cleaup was horrendous.

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
when you consider his "job" on the Montana Land Grab and Alaska preventing oil exploration and contributing heavily to the rise in oil prices buy a double whammy of no exlploration leasing and elimination of energy tax credits by "blaming those mean spirited republicans" it doesnt suprise me much you would see the effects. as for the war in iraq....
first wtc...clinton...no response
uss cole...clinton...no response.
african embassy bombings...clinton....no response
at least six separate chances to capture or kill bin laden in sudan...clinton...no response....so youve seen the point here too.
and as far as bringing health care, hillary already tried to nationalize the health care system twice with what even the rand corporation call disastrous results. when the governent cant even manage their own affairs, its easily predictable what will happen to the health care system if given the chance. on the off chance you dont listen to the news much and didnt know...remember Bush is president, these things have changed much for the better and next time dont wait so many years to post...it makes you look very very foolish.

2007-06-02 00:07:23 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 2

If you are going to make a statement like that then maybe you should tell us about your background and list some of your accomplishments.After all you might be part of the below average intelligence group that someone refereed to in another question.

2007-06-02 01:15:56 · answer #8 · answered by hdean45 6 · 0 3

I dont know why he is a retard, ( well, yeah i do), but all i want to know is if he feels guilty everytime a U.S. soldier gets killed in Iraq, and how he can sleep at night knowing he is breaking up families all over the U.S. by sending them to Iraq and having them come back in coffins. We are fighting in Iraq to help restore peace and order over there, but what about here? I think all the troops should come back home, and only get involved when it is a direct threat to the U.S. He is an idiot.

2007-06-01 23:13:49 · answer #9 · answered by Dannos 2 · 4 6

Yes you can call him a retard but why did we give him a second chance?We must be retarded too!

2007-06-01 23:28:45 · answer #10 · answered by Marilyn T 7 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers