Moon landing hoax or real……….?

Question

I still have my doubts with all the ‘errors' pointed out on the landing.

Anyone else thinks is a hoax or real?

Personally I think they filmed it all at ‘Area 51’
I think they just staged it to beat the other countries.

I mean WHY hasn’t man gone back to the moon since and landed on it………..?

Answer 1

i thought really hard about it..and America does have a motive to have faked it with the competition with Russia, and there is substantial evidence the footage is fake. and i thought real hard about that too..and i thought, even if they prove the photos are fake, it just proves the photos are fake. during the documentary, the man who designed the cameras they used in space said that the cameras quality wus no were near the ability to produce such photos, this was meant as evidence that the photos were fake, but it made me think..if the cameras were as low functioning as he stated, what if they were not functional at all on the moon? what if, after successfully achieving a moon landing, NASA terrifyingly realized they had nothing to show for it: hence the fake photos were made for the real moon landing. this is just a hypothesis, but just as valid as the one that states we never went there. i wud say the jury is out on this one until more evidence shows up. i dunt really know what to belive in the meantime, but i hope it wus real, not for the accomplishment, but for the prevention of such a terrible lie to humanity ♥

Answer 2

The moon landings were real. Setting aside all the "evidence" to the contrary for a moment, just consider this: so very many people would have had to be in on the conspiracy that there is no way that the secret could have been kept. Even if special agents went around to everyone working on the project and threatened to kill them and their entire family if they blabbed, someone would have let the secret slip, especially after 30+ years.
Man hasn't gone back to the moon because of the expense and for the simple fact that there is no reason to.

Answer 3

OK, I watched the whole thing. What a bunch of horsepucky! Not in the least bit convinced. At the beginning, they keep alluding to footage they never show, and is supposed to be partial "proof" of assertions made for the little bit of footage that they do show. As to the poor quality of the exterior shots on the moon, those were taking with an exterior mounted camera that had been over-engineered to withstand a lot, probably with extra thick glass, and in black and white because color was still relatively new at the time and they didn't want to risk it breaking down and not getting the shot of Armstrong's descent down the ladder and onto the moon's surface. Shading the windows was not done so as not to ruin their fake shot of the Earth, but to block the incoming sunlight to allow a clear shot of the Earth through the window. As anyone knows, if you're trying to see something outside your window at night, you need to turn off the interior light so you don't see it glaring on the window. In this case the sunlight reflecting off the interior walls would be the same as the interior light. The whole bit with the "crescent shaped insert" and the camera supposedly being outside the capsule... ludicrous. If a crescent shaped insert was being used, it would have a clearly defined edge, which it doesn't. There's one shot where they say the apparent shape of the Earth is because of the way it's being viewed through a thick window, but if that were the case, there would be obvious distortion across the face of the earth, and there isn't. The fact that they offer two different explanations for why the Earth appears to be not "full", is highly suspicious by itself. The "third party" saying "talk" in the conversation was just a prompt by Mission Control to get them to say something. And the "cryptic statement" by Armstrong to the students at the end, where he says "we've only completed the beginning", is him saying that Apollo was just the beginning of man's journey to space, and the "undone" part is up to future generations. I could go on in further detail about how idiotic this video is, but I'm tired and I'm going to bed. Goodnight.

Answer 4

Real. Many people believe it was fake because of the obvious. There were no stars when man landed on the moon. In fact the earths atmosphere/ozone layer magnifies objects that are outside of our atmosphere. We can see stars on earth with the naked eye, but in outer space there is no magnification so the stars can't be seen. The flag was waving is another argument. The flag was waving because of the pole it was on. If you take a look at the picture I posted, you can see a bar along the top of the flag as well on the side meaning if you were pushing it into the moon or ground of course it would be moving as it is in swinging motion.



http://www.novaspace.com/AUTO/SINGLES/LastMan.det.jpg


Hope I helped.

x x x

Answer 5

Fake fake fake, and Niel Armstrong should have won an Oscar after all of his performances. I don't claim to be a scientist, but last I knew shadows only come off of your body in 1 direction from 1 light source (aka the moon) so why in the shots of Armstrong & co you see multiple shadows all going in different directions...hmmm...and if there is not wind in space, how does the American flag appear to "fly" once it is placed...hmmmm, Biggest hoax the world has ever seen, just to say "we won the space race and were the "1st" on the moon", ya riiiiiight.

Answer 6

hard to say, that is what i was thinking for a long time, i say yes and no. mostly yes, because some of the photos were really weird, such as the man leaving a mark on the ground, but the spaceship didn't, the flag was fluttering, and many more. so, i think it might be a hoax. America was really scared when russia went around the world!

Answer 7

dude-i totally agree! if they had landed on the moon, the aliens living on the dark side of it would have eaten them!

Answer 8

hoax... why hasn't the other countries flown there to see if the flag is still standing?

Answer 9

hoax, NASA couldn't park a car

Answer 10

I don't know...good question though. Star for you.