2007-06-01 20:11:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I watch Law and Order and I think Fred Thompson is a good actor. I would never vote for him for president, though.
2007-06-01 21:01:00 · answer #1 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's funny, the Left trys and classify Fred Thompson as an actor.
When he has more Senate experience than either Hillary Clinton or Obama has.
When he has been in Government since the early 70's
And no one can say he is a partisan hack.
Since he was co-council in the Nixon Watergate hearings.
And his question is responsible for Nixon resigning.
His cancer isn't a problem, since he has non hoskins lymphoma classified at the lowest level, which is in remission and treatable with drugs, if need be.
So, yea, i'd probally vote for him over any of the currently announced candiates.
2007-06-01 20:34:50 · answer #2 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Perhaps. I like him better than all the other Republicans running right now.
He's in remission. Are we seriously not going to vote for a guy because he had cancer? He also has real political credentials. He's just as qualified as all the other losers running on both sides. Who knows - he might win. He's actually getting some attention and he hasn't even announced yet.
2007-06-01 21:02:59 · answer #3 · answered by TheOrange Evil 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO! anybody that desires to incriminate and penal complex a individual for merely getting intoxicated is nice out finished of ailment and hate and the stinkers who make weed unlawful are people who ought to be JAILED! Damned oppressive TYRANNICAL legislators like that should be HANGED! it's time to DECRIMINALIZE WEED AND enable people who ABIDE via THE regulation yet SMOKE WEED OFF THE HOOKS in any different case that's no longer A unfastened united states of america AND it's time FOR A BLOODY conflict ! ! the government HAS NO good to inform ME no count if i can GET severe OR no longer and that they only USE THAT FOR LEVERAGE OVER the human beings and that they ought to be PUBLICLY HANGED FOR IT!! specific it is nice I pronounced so ! ! The time is ripe for the regulation abiding electorate of united statesa. to upward push IN potential AND FLEX a sprint MUSCLE AND TAKE some RIGHTS FOR OUR very own!! we've a united states of america TO TAKE lower back FROM THE BANKER DICTATORS. Making it unlawful just to get severe isn't basically completely without reason, yet is barely a ability of having legally spawned skill and leverage over the human beings who use it. there is plenty they might use against those human beings which includes fairly while they are utilising for a job!! i think of we ought to continuously harm people who refuse to decriminalize it and we incriminate the incriminators and notice how they like it! BLOOD FOR BLOOD! Then issues would exchange through fact in Washington and in different top workplaces would is nice.
2016-11-03 09:44:05 · answer #4 · answered by courteau 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He has cancer and may not live through the stress of being in the White House.
2007-06-01 20:33:58 · answer #5 · answered by BOOM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would rather vote for Richard Belzer.
2007-06-01 20:23:48 · answer #6 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope! One Actor enough!
2007-06-01 20:16:07 · answer #7 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He actually has a reputation for being lazy. And given his medical history, a risk for sure.
2007-06-01 20:14:31 · answer #8 · answered by quint 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no. He has cancer and he'll lose. It's sad to see someone have cancer but a presidential candidate does not stand a chance in an election having cancer.
2007-06-01 20:15:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Check your history. He did more than acting! Yes, I would vote for him.
2007-06-01 20:28:02 · answer #10 · answered by steinwald 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋