i pose this question because liberals just dont know which to choose i guess. I mean on one side hes called a "Criminal mastermind!" that perpetuated 911 with his evil cohorts Dick Cheney! & the enemy of the state "Karl Rove!!" and fooled the entire world just so he can start wars and profit on oil!!
and on the other side, they call him this fumbling idiot who cant even phrase a sentence together, and makes up words while his administration is full of incompetent dopes who cant get anything right...
i mean, it makes no sense to me... you cant have it both ways wheres your credibility. its like the people who say he completely orchestrated 911 with his secret bunkers and laser beams, using CIA agents posing as Bin laden to cover it up...
let me ask you this... if hes such an evil genius that he perpetuated 911 to go to war.... why didnt he just go and plant WMDs in Iraq so he doesnt come out looking like a complete jackass to the entire planet...? where your logic on that one guys.
2007-06-01 18:33:21 · 28 answers · asked by Aldo G 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
just to clear things up... im asking liberals to make up their mind on the crap they always say, cuz their constantly contradict themselves...
i am not a liberal.....
2007-06-01 18:40:52 · update #1
i guess people cant sense the sarcasm in what i wrote.... IM NOT A LIBERAL!! liberals are a bunch of phony hypocrites
2007-06-01 18:44:17 · update #2
ahh, i see whats happening... people are just answering the headline.. and dont even have the decency to debate anything that isnt consistent with their progressive communist ideology...
2007-06-01 18:46:41 · update #3
oh i get it... oh now he didnt know about 911 or let it happen for a war...... ohh okay... it makes sense now... right.. god you people are easier to brainwash that cuban kids watching soviet cartoons.... it seems like its the same freakin person writing every comment... i mean... seriously... what has this country come too..
2007-06-01 18:51:16 · update #4
thank you to the small majority that actually read my question and answered with an open mind... and not spit out the same rhetoric that is indoctrinated into the media the internet. and then WE are the ones called the "Sheep of the media" when the majority of the people here all say the same thing.. for the same reasons, and have no factual grounds on any of the claims, other than their liberal smear sites, and propaganda documetaries that they ingest as fact... freedom of speech in this country is this countries Gift and its Curse...
2007-06-01 18:57:04 · update #5
truth be told. thank you for your comments... youve made some valid points that i completely agree with. Many of the things youve stated, the spending the bigger government all of that is what im opposed to this president on. But to call him an idiot is unfair. Being president of the United States is the hardest job on the planet, and Bush has faced more adversity in his 6 1/2 years in office than most other presidents.
2007-06-01 19:19:39 · update #6
Wow... their answers are sooo good and informative. Why did Ted Kennedy get kicked out of Harvard for trying to have someone take one of his finals meanwhile Bush got an MBA in Business? (from Harvard... after graduating Yale) hmmmm... I think the Kennedy's are pretty rich too... (I added this last line because it is easy to know what the little libs will say.... "Bush's Daddy paid for him to graduate") It's so easy it is embarrassing.
2007-06-01 18:45:56 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Perfect 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
He is an idiot!
I have never said HE orchestrated 9/11. He isn't that smart!
What I did say is that the government is not being honest about 9/11! Lots of things just do not add up!
He couldn't plant weapons in Iraq, especially with embedded reporters. In addition, anything that was found was so loosely guarded it was stolen and is being used for IE D's!
He'd have a hard time planting what Hans Blix, the Chief UN inspector said was not there!
The man has a credibility problem. He is a chronic liar and an alcoholic!
2007-06-01 18:41:33 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Mainstream liberals think he is an idiot (as do a growing number of conservatives), while far left liberals think he is the 9/11 mastermind. No one is trying to have it both ways. Different people in the same party can believe different things.
In the GOP, Pat Bucchanan warned that going into Iraq would be a disaster. Bush and Cheney said we'd be greeted as liberators. Is the GOP trying to "have it both ways" on Iraq? Most in the GOP talk about how they are fiscal conservatives, yet they passed pork-laden bill after pork-laden bill and plunged us into deficit. The GOP talks about how they hate "big government", yet convened a special session to discuss Terri Schiavo. What's next? Are they going to convene a special session to help me find my car keys?
The GOP claims to hate welfare, yet for every dollar the red states pay in taxes, they get $1.10 back in services, while blue states only get about 90 cents back for each dollar they pay. So tell me, who's on welfare?
You might want to take a look at your conservative brethren before complaining about Dems trying to have it both ways. Capiche?
2007-06-01 19:07:32 · answer #3 · answered by truth be told 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Evil Village Idiot
2007-06-01 18:58:05 · answer #4 · answered by Peace Warrior 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Village idiot. I've been consistent on that for years, now. And in response to the rest of your drivel, while I don't blindly buy into these conspiracy theories, and am willing to admit that I have no idea what really happened, regarding 9/11...oh yeah. Because obviously he would have had to put it all together and pull it off by himself, right? Not like he's got some kind of administration or anything. No, because Bush is the entire government, and the CIA, and the FBI, right? I don't believe any rational person has ever called Bush himself a mastermind of any sort.
2007-06-01 18:41:08 · answer #5 · answered by Master Maverick 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
I think that we, as Americans, should stand behind our president regardless of whether or not we agree with every policy he's for or against. I don't think he's happy either with the way things are going. I do think he did and is doing the best he can, given the crappy scenario's he, and we, are faced with.
2007-06-01 18:50:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Years prior Reagan, and Bush Sr had already given those weapons to Iraq to keep Iran in line. So he didn't have to PLANT anything there by way of WMDs. They were already there and Saddam had already allowed the U.N. to come in and dismantle them. Or didn't you see the news just a few years prior when Saddam was caught and the U.S. soldiers found the empty missles without the warheads?
To answer your question Bush is BOTH.
Just some additonal reading for you so you can understand your Nazi leader.
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/putting_it_all_together.htm
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/bush_family_and_the_s.htm
2007-06-01 18:46:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Conspiracy theorists say he is the evil genius.
People on the left say he is the village idiot.
There are conspiracy theorists on the left, but not all of the left are conspiracy theorists.
Aside from people who already believed that there are UFO's at Area 51 and Sasquatch is an al-Qaeda spy, I have never known any person to seriously say they believed 9/11 was carried out by anyone other than al-Qaeda.
2007-06-01 18:38:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Dude this is the best question I've had the pleasure of reading. Truly brilliant. You're right the libtards can't have it both ways that would not be logical but then again I've never met a logical liberal. Let alone one that can think for his/her self.
2007-06-01 18:51:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Village Idiot!
2007-06-01 18:37:34 · answer #10 · answered by chocolate_is_god 1 · 3⤊ 4⤋