English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

I'd say - Incomparable

for all our history across the millennia
for all our inheritance, traditions and cultures
for all our achievements and milestones
for all that we've built, from huts to skyscrapers
for all the knowledge that we have gained
for all of our capacity to love
for all the complexity of our thoughts
and for all that we stand to gain and also to lose....

even in mankind's darkest hours
even in the imperfection of our moralities
even in our greed for wealth, land and power...

humanity has always been incomparable,
for better or for worse

for no other creature that have walked the planet,
can ever compare to all that humankind has done
to affect so much change on the face of the earth....

2007-06-02 00:55:22 · answer #1 · answered by shahrizat 4 · 4 0

All of them. We are imperfect. We are defective. If you dont believe me look at Hitler, the Nazi, and the Third Reich. How anyone could treat their fellow man so cruelly is incomprehensable. It shows that we are broken, defunct, imperfect.
We are insatiable, always wanting more. We are greedy, whether it is for physical things, emotion attention, or knowledge, we always want more. Worse still we covet the things our neighbors have. We strive to keep up with the Jones by begging, borrowing, stealing, and cheating.
We are incomplete. Everyone has lain awake at night wondering why they are here, if there really is a God, and what will happen to them tomorrow. There are very few people in this life that know their purpose and when they fulfill it they often feel complete for a little while but then they need something else to fill them up.
And yes, yes we are incomparable. We have been given so much. We talk, think, write, express ourselves. We are capable of so much more than the animals with whom we share this sphere. According to the Bible we are made in the image of God himself. No other creature on Earth can make that boast.
So to answer your question we are all of those words and so much more.

2007-06-02 01:29:46 · answer #2 · answered by Beth W 3 · 2 0

I would say INSATIABLE, because who is to decide if we are incomplete, imperfect or incomparable? Those are very subjective judgments, and they almost require a comparison to other humanoids of sentient beings, before a fair analysis of such a subjective judgment can be made.
Insatiable is a characteristic that can be used to describe a person or group of people, without making a subjective judgment, like curious, playful or fearful.
Although the word "insatiable" carries some negative connotations, its meaning is descriptive of behavior.

2007-06-02 20:50:12 · answer #3 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 1 0

Incomparable but insatiable to the point of being imperfect but never incomplete - that's humanity , my dear .

2007-06-02 08:51:33 · answer #4 · answered by Prince Prem 4 · 1 0

Imperfect.

Because there are some people on this earth whom are not insatiable. They are content and satisfied.

And there are a lot of people who have found their reasons and own individual meanings to their lives and so have found their way into feeling complete.

And well, i believe that everything has similarites and is connected to one another in nature, so in that sense i think everything is comparable to everything else.

Imperfection seems to be the only thing that always remains the same. The one constant of life.

2007-06-05 05:10:12 · answer #5 · answered by Jaded 7 · 1 0

Incomplete

2007-06-02 00:49:07 · answer #6 · answered by MoonWater 3 · 1 0

Imperfect!

2007-06-02 08:03:31 · answer #7 · answered by see in you 1 · 1 0

Having no idea what perfect might be if it existed; reckoning we're complete at least to the stage we're at, even though evolution may not be finished; happy to compare us with anything you choose - and seeing our response to every novelty the market and our funds make available - I'd go for INSATIABLE. After all, look at the continuing population explosion and consequent resource use, far beyond what Earth can sustain if it's going to sustain anything else at all. We'd obviously chew the bottom out of a boat if we felt there might be a short-term benefit in it.

2007-06-02 01:17:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I think incomplete would be best, as it seems we have such a long way to go (if we ever get there) to be more tolerant, open minded, sensitive, non-judgmental, truly caring about others AND our planet & I could go on. (But I won't.) I'd say incomplete because I feel humans have the potential for so much more...

2007-06-02 20:43:45 · answer #9 · answered by Valac Gypsy 6 · 3 0

Incomprehensible. Sorry. I'm looking at this as humanity OVER TIME, & that is the commonality. We can take any chunk of time, & define what we think describes humanity.
Single focused, but in the disparity of "ways"--all the same. If I were absolutely forced to choose, I'd choose incomplete. Have we really evolved at all? Same motivations, different methods.

2007-06-02 02:52:01 · answer #10 · answered by Psychic Cat 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers