2007-06-01 15:41:10 · 7 answers · asked by D.F 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Just enough for everybody.
2007-06-01 15:44:31 · answer #1 · answered by Firespider 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tough one. I think everybody should work for what they have, and be paid what they are worth. I think the absurdly rich folks, you know, the ones who can live very well off just the interest their money generates for several generations, should pitch in a good deal more towards social services and taxes for schools and such than those who may be struggling, but communism, while a nice idea, has been proven to not work. So I'll have to say Untold riches for the few, with conditions, lol!
2007-06-01 22:54:41 · answer #2 · answered by venusiaint 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
trick question.
If you have "untold riches for the few" it could cause jealousy, animosity, and an out of whack hierachy, but you also have to look at it as a trickle down effect. At some point or another, those "few" will in one way or another share with others (one example, hiring people to do their bidding)
"just enough for everybody" sounds ideal, but it wouldn't happen. You would have people stealing from each other because it's human nature to always want more than what we have.
2007-06-01 22:50:34 · answer #3 · answered by keeperofusedshadows 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Enough for everybody. But then again if had untold riches then I would say screw the lot of you.
2007-06-01 22:45:04 · answer #4 · answered by Bru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just enough for everybody. Money doesn't equal "riches", anyway.
2007-06-01 22:47:37 · answer #5 · answered by Mel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spread the wealth but only once.
2007-06-01 22:44:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
more than enough for everyone
2007-06-01 22:44:48 · answer #7 · answered by diannegoodwin@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋