English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...that should be speaking out against terrorism'? I got many answers saying in effect, 'what about the Christian atrocities of the past?' Then I asked, 'What is the name of the logical error represented by these answers?' Nobody understood the second question. Do any of you, in this different category? What is the name, please. (Hint: Two wrongs don't make a right. Right?)

2007-06-01 15:06:27 · 8 answers · asked by rdk 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

8 answers

Well, it's really just changing the subject and straying from the original question. I don't know that you need a more technical term to describe what it essentially is.

2007-06-01 15:09:11 · answer #1 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 0 0

For the precise same reason that Christians do no longer come out and denounce the strikes of the extreme professional-lifers that shoot abortion docs and blow up clinics. they're the "lunatic fringe" and don't dignify a reaction. And in case you think of that each and each physique muslims are only like the extremists that are available, then you particularly ought to think of in extremes with each and every race/faith: All Catholics are staunch conservatives and don't eat on Fridays All White adult males elderly 18 - 35 are serial killers All Older white adult males will kill their co-workers All Black adult males are in gangs All women are knocked up for the seventh time via the seventh guy All Hispanics are unlawful from Mexico All Asians very own dry cleansing shops All Teamsters are working for the mob i ought to bypass on, yet i think of you have become my factor. what's going on right this is a lot of contain passing a judgment over a great inhabitants via the strikes of decrease than 10% of the team. no longer in basic terms is that incorrect, besides the shown fact that that's cheating. And if all of us thinks we ought to constantly choose all muslims on the strikes of that small praction, then all of us must be locked up because of the fact we've the flexibility of killing somebody or breaking a regulation. Our shape supplies for each individual - it became into written to be how human beings handle something of humanity besides as to be a instruction manual for expectancies for persons in this united states. To violate that to a small component of a inhabitants is to spit on it. after which you would be able to initiate kissing your rights stable bye, because of the fact at last somebody will reason that we did it to so-and-so, so it could be constitutional. and then those weapons would be next. . .

2016-11-24 23:28:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Hate and Revenge cannot result in peace.

Islam means Peace

Terrorism is not in Islam

Terrorists have hijacked Islam

2007-06-01 15:21:36 · answer #3 · answered by mohammad a 5 · 0 1

On the CBC in Canada, A'? Try radio one CBC

2007-06-01 15:09:18 · answer #4 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 0

they are the one that pray these whole thing they heard on the news and witness on their streets never happened at the first place. j

2007-06-01 21:08:47 · answer #5 · answered by Bernd A 2 · 0 0

That seems like an oxymoron.

2007-06-01 16:16:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the answer to the second question was, ignorance or stupidity.

2007-06-01 15:17:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For a modern, Muslim voice, please look up Reza Aslan. He is extremely intelligent and extremely well-connected.

2007-06-01 15:29:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers