GOERING:and BUSH - About "camps" should this scare people ?

Question

GOERING: You must differentiate between the two categories; those who had committed some act of treason against the new state or those who might be proved to have committed such an act, were naturally turned over to the courts. The others, however, of whom one might expect such acts, but who had not yet committed them, were taken into protective custody, and these were the people who were taken to concentration camps. I am now speaking of what happened at the beginning. Later things changed a great deal. Likewise, if for political reasons-to answer your question- someone was taken into protective custody, that is, purely for reasons of state, this could not be reviewed or stopped by any court. Later, when some people were also taken into protective custody for nonpolitical reasons, people who had opposed the system in some other way, I once, as Prussian Prime Minister and Reich Minister of the Interior, I remember...

Does Bush support the idea of detaining people without due process of law for a suspision "they might"

Why yes he does

Lillian

That would be bad enough if it were true but any American born person falls under the same set of laws where an arrest can be made on a belief of a future act

glock509

Hate ? It is a dire warning to the American people of what might be next

Answer 1

Well, the men held illegally by Bush can't get trial, can't get a lawyer, can't let their families know they are alive. The are tortured illegally. Another one at Gitmo "killed" himself yesterday. That's what they call it when a man is tortured to death in Bush's prison camps.

Answer 2

If it doesn't, perhaps this will:

"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
-- Hermann Goering, second in command of the Third Reich

Answer 3

Well in what context. If you by inference are talking of Club Gitmo. Then no I am not worried, the supreme court has already made rulings in this matter. I support detaining the enemy, period.

Now if by group, you believe that it is possible to "detain" people with out probable cause this also is a myth.

So no as an American I worry not. If i was a killer of Americans, or in support of terrorists, then I would be worried, after all is that not the point?

So Sayeth the Impaler!

Answer 4

Some of these camps have been there since 1957. I am hoping the government is trying to be ready for anything except what you are referring to.

Answer 5

i've got not got a difficulty with unfastened speech. merely considering the fact which you have the main appropriate to unfastened speech does not recommend there are not outcomes on your words. you be attentive to, merely like how Democrats boycotted Chick-Fil-A eating places through fact the owner did no longer have self belief in gay marriage?

Answer 6

Foreign Nationals are denied due process, not Americans.

Answer 7

Dude, you need medication. As if your other questions weren't bad enough, you went off the deep end into a paranoia trip may be permanent. See a psychologist now.

Answer 8

Only those who choose to understand...

Answer 9

ok so now bush is a nazi?allrighty then.
the hate just ozzes from you dosent it?