On 9/11, What Caused THOUSANDS OF TONS Of Concrete And Glass ....?

Question

....to spontaneously pulverize into fine dust in mid air in less than 15 seconds??

Here are a few quick visual reminders:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYUx5zJ3yss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_FIFcoVTo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8DWKaGVkAM

.......

Answer 1

First off these people who think that President Bush planted explosives are really really WRONG. First there were 2 JETS that flew into the towers and hit the main support column. You saw it on the news and on your clips.

Next to your question. When the two planes hit they struck a large support column that ran up the entire length of the buildings. That weakened the whole building. This column was a the main support for the building. After a while with jet fuel burning and the column failing the floors above started falling. One floor after the other failed causing all the dust and smoke began getting sucked in by the vaccum getting created as the floors fell. When concrete breaks it creates a little dust cloud. Tons of concrete breaking causes a larger dust cloud. As over 100 stories fell, more drywall and concrete broke until it was large enough to create a massive cloud of particales that covered much of New York City. The terrorist that flew these planes into the buildings were very very very crazy. Everyone knows that Osama was the master mined behind this plot. Oliver North once said that the only person that he feared was Osoma. This was way back in the 80's under the Reagan administration. In case that you do not know Oliver North he was high up in the Reagan White House. If we as Americans were smart we would stop fighting in our own country and band together to fight this crazy man called Osoma. We should all be worried after the threat at JFK Airport. Please support our troops whatever your political party.

After reading this please watch your clips very carefully it shows it.

Answer 2

You would expect that concrete would be pulverized when a 110-story building collapses.

Therefore, unless there is an published expert opinion that says otherwise, no further conclusions are indicated.
-------------
Also, the WTC towers did not come down symmetrically. WTC7 was struck leaving a 10 story hole. Other buildings nearby were not hit.

Answer 3

very simple, the WTC were very special buildings in the way that the supporting structure was the concrete walls! So to collapse like you have seen, the walls must explode under the weight in order to look like collapsing. Since concrete is far from being flexible, it just shattered in powder, leaving such dust clouds. If the building was made of steel structures like most of them, the structure itself would have twisted on itself but could not have pulverised or exploded like this, leaving bigger parcels of walls...

Answer 4

1) the WTC towers were 90% air
2) 63% of the "dust" is actually GYPSUM and drywall particles (and anyone who knows anything about DRYWALL knows that they can be "pulverized" to dust
3) some of the dust contained the fire retardant coating found on the steel joint trusses within the building
4) concrete accounted for less than 20% of the "dust" found at Ground Zero. Human remains counted for .6% of the material found at Ground Zero


repeating your lies over and over again do not make them true.

Answer 5

no where in this question does it say bush blew up th WTC.So what the question asks is what causes these buildings to pulverize.Why is it that those answers with bush and conspiricy in it are an over all angry response also very defensive.Cut and dry case it seems...hardley why are people asking questions getting responses like here we go again.Doesnt the debunking of 911 state who? why?flew the planes ? But questions like who financed the op? why hasnt the SCC reported on the puts?Do these questions get you upset?When one of your professors asked you a question in college did you get mad?People of this great country have the right to question now today and hopefully in the future.Right or wrong answers show me a report that proves all of the differences of opinion.The investigation into Monicas dress cost 3xas more than a report on 3000 American citizens death on our soil why? or does that get you mad too?
Take it to the streets people and ASK QUESTIONS?

Answer 6

The weight of the floors at the top falling was plenty of kinetic force to pulverise the rest of the building. Think about it.
Tall buildings are only strong when their structure is intact.

Once the structure was compromised nothing was holding the tons of concrete up at the top, so it came crashing down and enormous speeds.

Answer 7

ROFLMAO

Youboob is nothing more than someone's personal view point who has made up a blog on the net. It's complete rhetorical nonsense.

Answer 8

What is your theory? I think these buildings were destroyed by two jet airplanes filled with JP-4...this would cause the damage to the trade center. That is what I think.

Answer 9

And your point is? No wait I'm reading your brain.

MMMMM The Bush admin planted thousands of pounds of explosives in the WTC and blew it up .

Right? Do I win?

Answer 10

Dude.... Terrorists flew planes into several buildings on 9/11. Nice try Nancy but you aren't fooling anyone. Watch my link if you have the guts.