I haven't heard GWB call "Anti-Amnesty folks" racists. Do you have a link?
2007-06-01 12:35:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
I'm gonna try to not resort to name calling, but that man? we call the president is so out of touch with the American public, and what the majority thinks or feels about this immigration issue. And why wouldn't he be? He doesn't have to live next to or work with someone who can't even communicate with you, and he doesn't have to be a victim of one of their crimes, and he doesn't have to be the hard working American paying all these taxes for these illegal parasites that come here and walk around like they own the place, and think they have some special entitlement while their trying to shove their bullshit down mine or your throats! He is a sneaky bastard and he doesn't represent me as an American. People better wake up to his deception. A few articles I've seen recently tell me that HE is Americas biggest enemy! http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=15497 Here is another scary issue that seems to be getting swept under the rug, and I was quite taken aback when I learned that Bush signed this National ID Card/Act when it got snuck into Congress! People better start waking up! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7pHb7bPfMc
2007-06-01 15:58:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because that is how he tries to sway public opinion. Call anti-amnesty folks racists, call anti-war folks unpatriotic and not supporting the troops. He's got more names for people who don't go along with diversity and globalization to the extent it is headed. Or is that Cheney? They both do it.
2007-06-01 12:44:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oh the standard solutions. specific, Obama is president now, yet they by no ability criticised Bush lower back then, did they? in actuality, all of us knew it became a lie, and yet he had a number of his optimum help for invading Iraq. Phoenix even says that Bush did no longer lie approximately Iraq through fact they got here upon bio-weapons labs, properly, duh, the US have been monitoring those labs through fact the 1st gulf conflict had ended, Hans Blix became going into those places to make confident they weren't in use, and that they've been, er, no longer in use. Having labs does no longer recommend they have been getting used. As for looking mustard and serin gasoline, they of course did no longer locate adequate for it to be seen a probability to Israel, through fact the checklist says that no WMDs have been ever got here upon, or maybe ever existed in Iraq on the time. close to claims that's being misinformed. If installation your intelligence business enterprise to deliberatly "deceive" you a pair of specific problem and assist you be attentive to what you desire to hearken to isn't mendacity, then i think of i'm onto a winner right here. the problem right that's that good wingers desire to have self belief what they desire to hearken to. they only get their information from specific factors, the main appropriate wing press, so they do no longer look to be technically mendacity right here, they are merely taking part in ignorant via ignoring each and all of the correct information obtainable. i assume that's what they call irony.
2016-11-03 08:51:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are against the war, you are un-American. If you hate Bush , you are a traitor to the U.S. It is Bush's way of making people hate you. Now if we don't let a bunch of freeloaders in we are racists. Bush is the worst President in American history, bar none.
2007-06-01 12:39:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by oldhag 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because Republicans slander and lie about everyone who disagrees with them. They call all Liberals commies and foolish but they are the ones who give amnesty , it all started with Reagan.
2007-06-01 12:40:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In politics today, when you run out of sound arguments, you resort to name-calling. Bush has no sound argument in favor of this bill he has put into Congress. It's a big, deliberately deceptive piece of junk and he knows it.
2007-06-01 12:36:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by kscottmccormick 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I thought he called us unpatriotic? Although I disagree with his stance on amnesty and those of our Congressional leaders, I've not heard racist. Is this something new?
Okay, I'll have to assume that racist is something that you've conveniently made up.
2007-06-01 12:34:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why does Bush do anything?
Because the tellatubies told him to!
2007-06-01 12:35:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by lindseygirl 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Racist is a term used today when someone doesn't agree with your line of thinking. It is supposed to make someone feel guilty and change their opinion to that of their accuser's.
2007-06-01 12:35:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋