Hey conservatives, should we invade Iran or North Korea next?

Question

Or invade both at once for one of those trifectas that makes Bush so happy?

Answer 1

First of all, a trifecta would have to involve three things happening at once, not two. Secondly, here is the case for bombing Iran:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/federation/feature/?id=110010139

Answer 2

Invade the place? Your question makes little experience as North Korea does no longer have the skill to invade u . s .. If it has a plan it is going to invade in all hazard from Crossing the Pacific landing in California marching good as much as Washington DC overcoming each and all of the US protection tension opposition(except u . s . decides to no longer combat) and ask for unconditional renounce. what's obtainable is North Korea would hit at US bases in Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Guam and any US Fleet on the sea close to Korea if it decides to attack. As North Korea knows US will retaliate it has to have a huge first strike so US would be so broken it is going to be to liable to combat lower back(comparable seen Pearl Harbour).i do no longer think of North korea can destroy or weaken the US protection tension skill in a time-honored attack and that they be attentive to it too it is barely empty bluffing on the two facets yet while one ingredient makes a mistake the different ingredient is definitely to retaliate If a conflict starts people who're probable to go through maximum is the Koreans, jap and US infantrymen in bases interior the section

Answer 3

North Korea will become too expensive for china with it's limited approach to capital management, when grains double in price due to bio fuels. Uranium for food anyone?

The guys in the black towels should have been left to themselves, but we educated them. So lets give them reason to hate US. Go after their suppliers, hard. Set them up. That's what the cia is supposed to do. So simple a child can do it. Place large leveraged orders which fall through. Let's shake some countries beyond kennybunkport. A hiccup, then a sneeze, finally the flu.

Answer 4

Not a conservative, but if either country poses a legitimate threat to this country, it is the obligation and responsibility of the government to "protect and defend the country from all enemies, foreign and domestic."

Though not a Bush fan, you seem to be leaving out all of the Democrats who voted for and supported the decision to go to war.

By making this an anti-Bush question, you lose some credibility.

Should we be in Iraq? No. But our Constitution is set up to have checks and balances. Your 'team' was wrong as well.

Answer 5

Iran next, only we shouldn't invade, we should bomb. Just take out the whole place, but of course, that will never ever happen. So it's all just wishfull thinking. Then we should bomb North Korea. But since it's all never going to happen, we should just finish the job in Iraq and forget about ever eliminating Iran or N. Korea.

Answer 6

I think North Korea is somewhat under control, at least as under control at they will ever be. Iran is still an unknown but as we've always done, we will give the diplomatic channels a chance to work. If anything gets started it will be Iran starting it.

Answer 7

maybe they will just let us kill them and their kids and steal their stuff. LOL
Why dont Freedom Fighters support little george? Im afraid Iran and Korea may a few Freedom Fighters too but recomend we send all the bushbunch supporters to find out.
LOL

Answer 8

North Korea has a mutual-defense pact with China.

Iran has a mutual-defense pact with nobody.

Answer 9

I say North Korea. I think Iran will make the appropriate changes internally.

Answer 10

The Conservative love to fight, keep fighting for their great President that odd ball sitting in the Oval office with specs on . He is making out like he reading and writing
he is really looking at some nursery books , you don't have read just look and laugh at the 3 Bears that mommy read to him.