What would happen if we invested 100 billion dollars in developing a gas alternative instead of the war.?

Question

I read in the NYT that Bush will send 100 billion dollars of our tax dollars to Iraq. I don't really know whos pocket that will end in. I haven't driven a car in two years, Just my bicycle. I used to have a car and sold it. Yes, I'm kind of scatterbrained today.

Answer 1

Why did we elected two oil men from Texas.

Answer 2

100 billion is not enough-- maybe 100 bb a year for a decade would work assuming the right people and programs got that money. Don't forget that we have built up an infrastructure and economy based on oil and derivatives for 100 years. That infrastructure does not get displaced easily.

Practically all alternative energy sources (e.g. ethanol, hydrogen, biodiesel) are more expensive to produce and/or barely energy positive. The cheapest fuel for cars is still pumping oil from the ground and refining it.

As for 100bb going to iraq... in case you didn't notice we've already spend over 300bb there. I think the run rate is like a few billion per week.

Answer 3

The oil companies would find some way to sabotage the efforts. They are the ones who have the plans of a design for a carburetor that gets 90 mpg. They also have given millions to Congress to keep pot from being legalized because they have found a new fuel the burns cleaner from pot and the oil companies would lose money.

Answer 4

to three quantity, particular. My husband works the Chicago Marathon according to annum, and he commented final nighttime that if he'd been doing the comparable activity in Boston, he could have been precise interior the region of the explosions. of path this further homestead the certainty of the attack in a fashion no longer the rest could have, and it is made me nerve-racking suitable to the potential for a copycat attack in October, whilst the Chicago Marathon would be run. in addition to, I as quickly as stated as Boston homestead and understand the section the place the explosions got here approximately particularly properly. I lived close by and used to pass out to cheer on the Marathon runners each and every Patriots' Day. That, too, made the form greater actual to me. besides the incontrovertible fact that, I knew somebody who died on 9/11, and as undesirable as this tragedy is, it pales in assessment, although no longer, I understand, for the family contributors of the lifeless and heavily wounded. as properly, my instincts are telling me that this replaced into no longer an attack by foreign places terrorists yet fairly the artwork of a homegrown nutcase. That someway places a distinctive complexion on the project, although of path i must be fullyyt incorrect.

Answer 5

We don't even need a gas alternative. If US automobiles matched the average fuel efficiency of cars now being driven in Europe we wouldn't need a drop of Middle Eastern Oil. We'd be totally energy self-sufficient.

Answer 6

Nothing would happen. We've invested over 200 billion dollars for AIDS research in the last 15 years, and that's going nowhere fast.

Answer 7

Somebody who started a 'gas alternative research company' would be a lot richer, and we'd still all be burning gas in our cars.

Answer 8

We'd have 100 billion less to put toward a war for oil.

Answer 9

maybe a philanthropic billionaire will read you question and set up a foundation to promote alternative fuel, and energy sources.
innovation, often times, comes from the private sector

Answer 10

If you invested in a viable gas alternative you would become a very rich man.