Who is a bigger threat to the U.S., Hillary or Bin Laden?

Answer 1

What's the difference? They'll probably be running mates.

Answer 2

I cant believe that somebody actually said Bin Ladin cant really do us any more harm.
I believe that any republic elected to office will feel the pressure to "stay the course" in Iraq. I thought somebody once said it wasnt our duty to fight in other countires civil wars. I guess it is now. I dont know if I would vote for Hillary but she certainly doesnt pose the same kind of threat as Bin Ladin.
I believe if you take count though, Bush is responsible for more American casualties then Bin Ladin and Hillary combined!

Answer 3

This is a very silly question which has created a great debate. I agree with a vote against hillary isn't a vote against women. I'd gladly get behind Condoleeza Rice, she seems very professional, and manages to get things done. Hillary is evil. Obama isn't really doing much, he's "afraid" to get out and talk, because one slip up and he knows he's done. Hillary voted for the war, then she flipped when she realized it wouldn't help her get elected. The attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon weren't instigated by the Bush administration, people need to get their heads out of their as*es because there's no way one man could stir so much hatred in so little time, Bush was elected and took office in November of 2000, 10 months later we were attacked...it started with Jimmy Carter, and has been perpetuated by both democrats and republicans ever since, Bush was just left holding the bag, and he's done the best he can with the intel (accurate or inaccurate) and he's become the town whipping boy.

Answer 4

Hillary is a joke and I seriously doubt she'll even get the nomination. Bin Laden is a dilapidated old man living like a goat in a cave, but Nanzi Pelosi... Now she's very dangerous to the US.

Answer 5

Obviously bin Laden. In fact, if either Clinton were president in 2001, we would have caught bin Laden by now. That is, if they hadn't prevented the 9/11 attacks, which might also be the case.

Answer 6

hillary is the bigger threat, hubby could have had bin delivered when he was prez, now bin laden is campaign manager for hillary

Answer 7

I guess it would be "Hillary." This is only due to the Bush Administration apparently have no interest in tracking down the 6'5" thin, suffering from Kidney failure, rides a camel, wears sandals and hides out it caves AKA Bin Laden.
If Bush and his boy's tried to bother Bin Laden, that might appear as though he had something to do with "911."
The "world" knows the real culprit was named Saddam Husein. . .

Answer 8

neither. hillary isnt threatning, she just wants power. and in my opinion we make bin laden a threat ourselfs. he doesnt try to be one.

Answer 9

Hillary....she'll allow Bin Laden, Ahmadinejad, and that short little pipsqueek from N. Korea to do as they please while we try to be diplomatic.

Diplomacy is indeed the first steps, no question. It's just that we keep setting up a line to cross...they cross it....we set another line...they cross it....and so on.

There comes a time when diplomacy must end and cleaning house begins...and that goes for both Republican and Democrat alike.

Answer 10

If Hillary gets in they BOTH WIN, She will dismantle the Constitution starting with the 2nd Amendment, then when the people are no longer armed, the only protection we will have is a gutless, liberal, "can't we get along", "it takes a village to raise a child"(but only one fool to kill it), no military, politically correct Administration!!!!! Damn that scared me just writing it!

Answer 11

It depends on whether you're talking short-term or long-term. Bin Laden is like a rock that hits you in the head - on the short-term it hurts like the devil but will likely heal. In the case of Hillary (or any liberal that salutes the flag by sticking his/her hands in the air and saying "We give - it's the fault of the American people..") she is more like a cancer. It will start slowly and probably unnoticed but in the long-term it will kill its host. Or in the case of liberal Democrats - it will be the demise of a once proud nation and the greatest democracy that ever existed.