I like how in more totalitarian societies, people must support their leader and they work more for their money. If you try to embarrass your country by protesting your leader, you are run over by tanks and fired on by the military. They have TRUE rule of law. Bush should kill every protester that dares to embarrass the US in the streets of Washington. If he killed all of the protestors, the US will look more dominant and powerful. The US should become a totalitarian state, to shut up Liberals and communists everywhere.
2007-06-01 09:54:35 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The libs only admire totalitarian societies outside our borders. Should Venezuela happen here, there would do exactly what they have done here: whine about poll ratings and call the ACLU.
2007-06-01 10:05:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
The fact of the matter is that this country has the ability to quiet all protestors every 4 years. And the last time we had a revolution to quiet protestors, the American public said that they liked what President Bush was doing; hence, he was re-elected. People tend to think that because the democrats took Congress that the American public was dissatisfied with what the Bush Administration was doing in Iraq, but the contrary is actually true. The American public was tired of the whimpy republicans who strattled the fence. The American public wants a conservative government and when they get it, there will be a lot less protests.
2007-06-01 10:08:07 · answer #2 · answered by Michael H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I support the president simply because he is our president... I do not agree with the things he does though. Plus, everyone has the right to question the government... we will not shutup. This government is based on free speech which includes the right to protest. I know you will probably give me a thumbs down... but I don't care... I do support our president even though I disagree with him and I think if you beleive in killing people for protesting and questioning the government, you should live in a dictatorship because that is how things are run there. This ENTIRE country was founded of freedom of speech. I am so glad that you are not a politician.
2007-06-01 10:04:17 · answer #3 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
religious leaders who help the main appropriate are extra in contact then on the left. possibly I havent seen any, yet there are no left canidates who certainly marketing campaign with the religious leaders working example Santorum. those on the left are in desire of seperation of church and state extra desirable than the main appropriate merely like the main appropriate appreciates the 2nd ammendment extra then the left. The left became disenchanted while Boener had a non secular amassing on the Statue hall on Capitol Hill. between those leaders werw some very anti gay preachers. one in each of which preaches that aides is a retaliation via GOD against homosexuality and yet another claimed good after 9/11 that we deserved it through fact we enable gays and illegals to function in our society, for which he apologized day after today for his wording. Statue Hal is paid for via tax money and this does look strange.
2016-11-03 08:32:07 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you just described, reminds me a little of, that country, what was it called , starts with an N.....of yes, North Korea!
But I thought you were against "commies", Adolf?
I would suggest you think through these ridiculously stupid questions, but that is all they are anyway: stupid.
This reply is written by a Social Democrat
2007-06-02 04:55:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
During the civil war, Abraham Lincoln rounded up "peace democrats" (anti-war libs of the 1800's) and put them in jail. I think we need to bring that tradition back!!!
Liberals dont support their leaders because they have their own selfish agendas. When a democrat is voted into office for instance, we hear a lot of talk about "respecting the will of the voters." But when republicans are voted in, that apparently means nothing to them.
2007-06-01 10:20:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are worried about embarrassment and you support the biggest presidential embarrassment ever? You Repub fascist sheep are amazing, blindly following your moron leader over the cliff. Good riddance!!!!!
2007-06-01 10:19:47 · answer #7 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In a shout out to the British roots I wish I had, "YOU ARE A BLOODY IDIOT!!!!!"
Patriotic my ****!!!!!
Our rule of laws allows protests of the government, and since war is the most crucial of all political issues, they have the right to protest, call Bush names, use fabrications, and use evidence to prove their point.
Why are you not organizing a counterdemonstration in support?
-War Supporter
2007-06-01 10:01:20 · answer #8 · answered by Tom Sh*t 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, according to his approval ratings, you would have to kill a bunch of conservatives also.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
Theodore Roosevelt, 1918
2007-06-01 09:59:36 · answer #9 · answered by SlickWillie 3 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Your name is such a misnomer to your beliefs.
You are not a patriot and what you have said is absolutely Anti-American.
You are advocating establishing a dictatorship.
2007-06-01 10:08:39 · answer #10 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋